Numenoreans attacking the Valar

[Morthoron]

Originally Posted by littlemanpoet

This doesn't quite sit right with me. From my reading, the Vanyar are considered to be the most blessed of all the Elves because they journeyed west and stayed. So this bit of "interference" doesn't seem to have been a bad thing. That some Elves begrudged the invitation of the Valar may say at least as much about these Elves as it does about the Valar.

I suppose it is a matter of personal taste. The Vanyar were the most blessed? Why, because they sat at the bottom of Taniquetil and adored Manwe with endless blind praise? What did they accomplish? They seem rather dull, don't they? I'll take Feanor any day over a bunch of righteous brown-nosers.

Originally Posted by littlemanpoet

I grant that both the invitation to the Elves and the creation of Numenor were in part to "save" these two groups from the shadow of Morgoth; but is that a bad thing?

Anytime one corrals folks for their own good, no good can come of it. It seems to me the major failing of the Valar was that they did not adequately eradicate Morgoth and his minions. They botched it on several occassions. And after each war with Morgoth, they left the people of Middle-earth alone to muddle through the mess the Valar left behind. Sauron managed to elude them twice, and the Valar ignored the fact, and basically ignored the struggling Children of iluvatar for huge stretches of time. Very sloppy in my opinion.

Originally Posted by littlemanpoet

As to not hearing from them for an Age, whose fault was that? Was it not because the Numenoreans fell to craving deathlessness?

The Valar allowed Sauron to consolidate his power after Morgoth's defeat in the War of Wrath (end of the 1st Age) until they sent the Istari in the 3rd Age. That is an entire age of indolence! The Numenorean's search for immortality has nothing to do with the Valar's silence. They did the same thing in the 1st Age, only begrudgingly aiding Middle-earth when Earendel brought them a silmaril as a bribe.

Originally Posted by littlemanpoet

And are you sure you are being fair by using the rather derotagory term, "meddling"? Did they not have the right and responsibility as the assigned caretakers of Aman to do precisely that? What was it about their "meddling" that was an evil? or a weakness?

See above. Like overly maternal or paternal parents, they restricted the elves and alloted them a few mean acres in Valinor. A rebellion of the sort that occurred was inevitable among creative and fiercely freedom-loving folk like the Noldor. Then to top it off, while they were coddling the Eldar, the Valar left mortal men all alone in the infancy of their race so that they could fall more readily under the dominion of Morgoth and his successor. It makes little sense, and their uncertainty moving forward is evidently a weakness.

Originally Posted by littlemanpoet

And was Eru "irritated" at the Valar? Where do you get that from the Sil? And was his motivation so that there would be no more chosen people? Please give evidence.

I was being facetious. But you have to admit, Eru went beyond merely punishing Ar-Pharazon and his army. He wiped Numenor off the map. Tolkien doesn't deal with Eru's motivation in behaving in such an arbitrary and all-encompassing manner, but one can derive a certain sense of wrath in Iluvatar that is not characteristic of the patient and benign, but still omnipotent, symphony conductor we beheld during the Ainulindalë. It seems he corrected an error on the part of the Valar, and from then on the Valar only dealt with Middle-earth through intermediaries (ie., the Istari).

Originally Posted by littlemanpoet

Granted, the Valar appear to have learned hard lessons by the 3rd Age and therefore only sent the Five Istari, but can you really support your assertions with evidence from Tolkien's writings?

When I have time, I'll delve a bit further.