Quote:
Originally Posted by Pomegranate
Though Nogrod kept saying he's semi-serious, instead of just ranting around. And isn't that exactly what baiting is (at least that's how it would sound to me, unless you use it with slightly different definition) - not a serious wish to lynch someone (I wouldn't call Shasta's actions baiting) but some kind of reminder, "hey, you know, then there's this one... anyone? Feel like continuing this discussion?"
|
Mhm - generally, baiting works more along the lines of "(insert several paraghraphs about various issues) --- Also, I think XY seems a bit strange with this and that. I am not sure if it is something, but it might be. Maybe we should look at it." This was a bit too outright (and said in the tone of sort of-exaggeration) in order for it to be baiting.
Quote:
a) I didn't say you suspected, I said I didn't see that comment as fishy and
|
Well, "fishy" to me is used in the context of suspecting people. Okay, I see, I have used that in the post 44 as the general "headline" of the section of the weirdest people around, but that was generalizing; I said in the post itself, as you can read there, that I don't in fact suspect
Inzil.
Quote:
And although you want to concentrate on the accusations about Legate-Inzil -issue, that is far from being the only thing I said about you. You went for anyone someone else suggested - except Lommy. Inzil was the one that you found yourself, correct, but then you picked up Boro from Greenie's idea and pursued that with some enthusiasm for a while, until you realised you couldn't get people to back it, and then went on with Nog about G55.
|
Strong words once again, but I would also ask you to reconsider looking at it also from a different perspective. Also, I came up with
Boro after seeing he was really acting non-innocentBoro-ishly, and later you followed on what I had said about him. I did not "realise I could not get people to back it", I continued having him as my top suspect, as you can read yourself (before I finally decided to vote
Bom). I considered
G55 after her vote, but I was saying from the beginning that I would not probably vote her on that day, but keep her for later. If I really wanted to e.g. save
Lommy, I would not have split opinions (and votes!) in that way - stirring up suspicion of
G55 and at the same time not wishing to vote her myself. Also, I had noted some (though just little) suspicious stuff about her already earlier.