|  | 
|  | 
| Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page | 
|  03-10-2010, 07:14 PM | #9 | |
| Late Istar Join Date: Mar 2001 
					Posts: 2,224
				   | 
			
			I love the Gest.  I know a lot of people feel that Tolkien was not at his best with rhyming couplets, or that the form is too repetitive and not suitable for a long narrative, but personally I don't agree with either of these complaints.  Certainly some passages are better than others, but even in its weakest moments the Lay seems to me to retain a wonderful lyricism and vivacity. I agree with Mnemosyne that the post-LotR revision is better than the original. Indeed, I would say that the quality of Tolkien's poetry in general was higher in the period during and after the writing of LotR than before. To my ear, the revision is more sweetly evocative in passages such as: When sky was clear and stars were keen, then Dairon with his fingers lean, as daylight melted into eve, a trembling music sweet would weave on flutes of silver, thin and clear for Luthien, the maiden dear. And the description of Morgoth and the Dagor Bragollach is more dreadful and powerful: A king there sat, most dark and fell of all that under heaven dwell. Than earth or sea, than moon or star more ancient was he, mightier far in mind abysmal than the thought of Eldar or of Men, and wrought of strength primeval; ere the stone was hewn to build the world, alone he walked in darkness, fierce and dire, burned, as he wielded it, by fire. Quote: 
 It is true, though, that Tolkien's output of poetry declined significantly in quantity over the course of his life. He never gave up poetry completely - the revision of the Gest around 1950 is one indication of that. But I think that the success of LotR gave him an impulse to write more prose (and in particular to complete The Silmarillion) that largely trumped his impulse toward poetry. Last edited by Aiwendil; 05-27-2015 at 10:57 AM. | |
|   |   | 
| 
 | 
 | 
|  |