![]() |
![]() |
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
![]() |
#11 | ||
Wight
|
Borrowing from Nog here to try and work things out.
Sally/Glirdan - gifted/innocent Shasta/Alona - unknown/innocent (yeah, I know, no hard proof yet) Morsul/Wilwa - hunter/unknown Rikae/Izzy - innocent/unknown Nog/Lottie - unknown/innocent Dun/Lari - unknown/unknownprobablyinnocent Assuming there's no wolf-wolf pairs here. If there is already a known gifted/innocent pair, it's probable that the Hunter and/or Ranger were paired up with innocents, too. That would leave 6 others - three wolves and three innocents. So no wolf-wolf pairs with this line of thinking. This also means Wilwa is most likely innocent and that whoever is paired with the Ranger might be innocent, too. Now for the wolf-innocent pairs. That leaves Shasta, Izzy, Nog and Dun (or Lari) as a wolf. Ugh that's five people. Well, to narrow it down, if we go along with Sally referring to the Ranger as a she, that rules out Izzy, as she and Rikae could be the third gifted/innocent pair. It also rules out Lari and Dun, as they could also be the third gifted/innocent pair. So that leaves Shasta and Nog. While I'm tempted to lean more against Shasta than Nog now that he's tried to broaden his suspicions, he is going after Wilwa who I mostly trust to be innocent and now Lari who I'm 99.9% sure is innocent. If the Ranger is a he and Sally was just using wordplay, then that rules out Shasta/me, Nog/Lottie and Dun/Lari, leaving Izzy as a wolf paired with known innocent Rikae. So, conclusion: I might vote either Shasta or Nog. I probably won't vote Wilwa, Lari and certainly not Sally. Quote:
Quote:
__________________
"Puddle! Puddle! Oh, snow! Future puddle!" Last edited by alonariel; 01-17-2010 at 04:14 PM. Reason: X'd with Sally and Wilwa and bolding |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |