![]() |
![]() |
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Wight
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: In the cold
Posts: 202
![]() |
![]()
Ok, to clear up the question raised about me:
Quote:
It's really interesting to read all y'all's lists, so I'm making one, little sense though that makes. Aganzir - I got nothing. Boromir88 - Seems the sensible sort, but I don't know yet. Brinniel - Everybody seems to trust her, and there's no reason from her posts for me not to, so naturally I'm highly suspicious. Diamond18 - I dunno if that post was just her usual voice, but it felt weird to me. Eönwë - No idea. Gil-Galad - He's a friend of Perky. That means wolf. Little Green - Makes a lot of sense. Probably innocent and my suspicions are further proof of an undiagnosed paranoia syndrome. Gwathagor - ли́чно я с ним незнако́м. (I don't know him). Ilya - Possibly a Tolstoy protagonist. Legate - One of the vets that have overwhelmed me with posts. They all make sense, but I'm a little skittish right now of people who are posting long posts and posting a lot, not because it's a bad thing. The more people post the more we have on them, I'm just not used to the high rate and length of posts, is all. Lommy - I agree with Legate. She seems genuine. Kath - I don't know why, but I'm trusting her right now. McCaber - Also seems innocent, although poking the phantom could be a great cover for a wolf. mormegil -Also one of the vets who's already intimidated me. Nerwen - No se. Nogrod - Makes a lot of valid points. Not sure I'd want him for my rep just yet, but seems very focused. Rune - Also a friend of Perky's. Totally a wolf. Sally - Dunno. Shasta - I like his handle. Has a lot to say, but I'm not sure I'm getting all of it. The Ka - Also love the handle if it's from where I think it's from. I'd like to hear more from her. the phantom - How does one judge an entity? I'm buying into tp so far, although I don't want to make him a rep, just because I know he'll contribute anyway. As to making "quiet" people reps in order to draw more out of them, I think there ought to be a mix of uber-posters and lurkers. Or to put it another way, it's a good idea to flush out those of us who aren't speaking, but it's also a good idea to let at least one experienced writes-a-lot have the power to vote, so that all the reps can't fall back on tp's or Legate's or Shasta's Day 2 arguments.
__________________
Arvedui III has walked to Rivendell! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | ||
Laconic Loreman
|
Quote:
I think we're un-needlessly complicating the "Who I want as a rep" situation. I don't like the idea of putting a suspected/possible wolf as a rep, for the purpose of getting a concrete vote out of them. Nogrod, if you're not a wolf, I know you won't let the quiet ones slip unnoticed, and if you are a wolf, you still won't let the quiet ones slip unnoticed. What's the reward here? I want someone who I trust is innocent, as well as someone who will represent my voice. That simple. We have an advantage in numbers, and the advantage of not allowing the wolves get control of who gets lynched. Yes, ordo's will make mistakes, but at least I know they mean for the best. Because the fact is, as hard as we could try to not get a wolf in as a rep, it's going to happen, period. That doesn't mean we should help them out and hand them the reigns. Quote:
Ok, but seriously now, I think I said before whether I have any voting power the next 24 hours or not, I'm still going to be active and lobbying. That's not going to change. Or if you want to put it this way, I aint gonna shut up. That's enough for me about the dynamics of representatives, when I return from dinner I will log my thoughts and make a decision on my rep.
__________________
Fenris Penguin
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |