![]()  | 
		
| 
 | 
| 
 Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page  | 
| 
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#1 | 
| 
			
			 Loremaster of Annúminas 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Oct 2006 
				
				
				
					Posts: 2,330
				 
				
				
				![]() ![]() ![]()  | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		 
			
			Although Tompkins and Atkins are not bad representations of Oxford faculty today, in terms of regard for Tolkien's legacy.  While there are a handful who value his fiction, the Consensus Position is that Tolkien frittered away what should have been a brilliant career on his fairy nonsense, instead of publishing proper papers and books on English philology: the promise of his young adulthood squandered. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			(NB: why those names? Derived from Tommy Atkins? Some drollery regarding the diminutive suffix?) ---------------------------------------- It's perhaps noteworthy that Tolkien wrote Leaf in 1943- in other words when The Lord of the Rings had been stalled for at least a year and he at the time didn't see it getting on. Both the LR and his Legendarium can vbe seen as the Tree, and so it's interesting how slighting the author's voice is in regard to the Tree's quality and importance. Not really very good, but unusual and thus not entirely devoid of interest. And then Niggle's fantasy, of someone coming in and giving him a public pension so he wouldn't have to worry about anything but painting- how the overworked wartime Professor must have longed for that! 
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
	The entire plot of The Lord of the Rings could be said to turn on what Sauron didn’t know, and when he didn’t know it.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#2 | |
| 
			
			 Princess of Skwerlz 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Jan 2002 
				Location: where the Sea is eastwards (WtR: 6060 miles) 
				
				
					Posts: 7,500
				 
				
				
				![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()  | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		 
			
			I would like to add a few thoughts gleaned from Scull and Hammond's "Reader's Guide" on this story before the thread goes "treeish" (appropriately?): 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			Tolkien himself confirms the allegorical nature of the tale, though he writes (in a Letter to Jane Neave in 1962) that is more "mythological". His Tree is indeed the LotR. Some commentators consider the religious nature of the allegory, others explore the connection to his views on sub-creation and eucatastrophe, to which this story gives literary form. Another (Ellison, quoted by S and H), examines it as Quote: 
	
 Further posts are not only allowed, but welcome; however, I am ending the "official" discussion for now. 
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
	'Mercy!' cried Gandalf. 'If the giving of information is to be the cure of your inquisitiveness, I shall spend all the rest of my days in answering you. What more do you want to know?' 'The whole history of Middle-earth...'  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#3 | 
| 
			
			 Overshadowed Eagle 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Nov 2017 
				Location: The north-west of the Old World, east of the Sea 
				
				
					Posts: 3,972
				 
				
				
				![]() ![]()  | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		 
			
			I actually have no idea which branch of Christianity I picked up the following idea from, but: there is a belief that God the Father has created a system of perfect justice, under which any sin or transgression deserves punishment; and since God's authority is absolute, the punishment is also absolute. In other words, in strict justice, everyone should go directly to Hell, neither passing Go nor collecting 200 currency units. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			That's where God the Son comes in. Christ's sacrifice, through complex theological reasons, let him take responsibility for all those sins; but because he didn't actually do them himself, he can plead for mercy on behalf of the people who did. Thus, through Christianity, sinful humans can neverthless have a hope of Heaven. This is the viewpoint on which my firm identification of the First and Second Voices as the Father and Son rests. Their talk of Justice and Mercy is that intercession. I've kind of always treated that as a certain fact, but it occurs to me - rather late - that there probably could be other interpretations. ^_^ (I think Catholicism talks about Mary interceding with Christ on behalf of the faithful, for example.) ~ I also realised a couple of days ago, that the Voices have an echo in the Legendarium. There are two Valar with authority over the dead - Mandos, the Doomsman of the Valar, who stands in judgement; and Nienna, the incarnation of Pity, who pled for mercy for Melkor, and alleviates the sorrow of the dead. Justice and Mercy, Voices One and Two. What's interesting is that this isn't how they were originally. Fui Nienna of the Lost Tales is a full on dark goddess; her roof is made of bat's wings! It's only later that she became Mercy; and if that change came in the 1930s Silmarillion, then it's just about the same time he was writing the Two Voices in Leaf by Niggle. hS 
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
	Have you burned the ships that could bear you back again? ~Finrod: The Rock Opera  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
![]()  | 
	
	
		
  | 
	
		
  | 
| 
 |