![]() |
|
|
|
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Wight
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 121
![]() |
I agree with all of your comments, and I like the way you combined things in point 3.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
RP-SL-26: What is our source for creating a footnote here? For me that is a no go.
2) RP-SL-32: Agreed. But I would keep ‘At that time’. 3) Okay Gandalf85 had the text as we wanted it. And I don’t really see the problem. In the second sentence it says that ‘At that time’, which means both sentence speak about the same event. But if both of you think ArcusCalion edit is better, I am okay with it. But the editing is much easier, I think, in this way: Quote:
Respectfully Findegil |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Quentingolmo
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 525
![]() |
3) For me Fin, your construction is still awkward in that it mentions Celeborn going to Lorien twice in a row for no particular reason. I think we should just keep "and fortified it against any further attempts of Sauron to cross the Anduin" as part of RP-SL-32b.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |||
|
Wight
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 121
![]() |
1) I didn't have a source for the footnote, I was proposing using some of the main text to create a footnote. But if the project is against creating footnotes, then just removing it as in your draft is fine.
3) I am still confused by the movements of Galadriel and Celeborn. We agree that these two sentences are occurring at the same time and referring to the same movement, right? Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |||
|
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
3) I have to apologies again. That was my bad editing. I didn’t want to change the clean text of ArcusCalions version, I wanted only to simplify the editing. I agree to join the sentences and only to keep ‘and fortified it against any further attempts of Sauron to cross the Anduin.’ But I think we should make clear that Celeborn was acting in that fortification and not Galadriel, otherwise we change a fact in the story.
Posted by gandalf85: Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Findegil |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Quentingolmo
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 525
![]() |
This is fine for me, except you have a typo. You have 'here' instead of 'her.'
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Wight
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 121
![]() |
Fin, I really like this version. I too was worried about "changing the facts" by implying both Galadriel and Celeborn fortified against Sauron since this is not explicitly stated (even though I think it's reasonable to assume Galadriel was involved, the text does not support this).
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|