![]() |
|
|
|
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Quentingolmo
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 525
![]() |
After we decided to add in the bits from the Prologue to LotR about the Finding of the Ring, I think we should take as much of the Prologue as possible. Therefore I have tried to find the best places for all of it to fit. Here is where I placed some of it, in a replacement of GHA-SL-12:
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
Agreed, very nicely integrated.
Respectfully Findegil |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |||||||||||
|
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
I copy this post from gandalf85, because I think this is where it should have been:
Quote:
Findegil |
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |||
|
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
Grammatical issues: Thanks for spoting these.
Suggestions/questions: 1) Yes, we thought that the importance of that protection was not fully understood. I agree to the reordering. 2) ‘neglected’ does not mean that it was fully stopped. The meanings I found are ‘uncared-for’; ‘bedraggled’. While ‘cased’ and ‘unmanned’ suggest the final end guarding Mordor. At least that is how I saw these quotes. That why I don’t see a contradiction but step by step degeneration. 3) Agreed, very nice final result, but the editing should be a bit easier in this way: Quote:
Quote:
Maybe we should as well move GHA-SL-29 and GHA-SL-30, since as they stand they are separating to connected narratives. I would move GHA-SL-29 to this place: Quote:
Respectfully Findegil |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Wight
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 121
![]() |
2) OK, a step by step degeneration makes sense.
3) Looks good. 4) That works. 5) I agree to where you moved GHA-SL-29. Moving GHA-SL-30 right before the subheading FY-HL-06 The Northmen and the Wainriders makes sense to me. Last edited by gandalf85; 01-10-2019 at 04:54 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Quentingolmo
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 525
![]() |
Sorry for the late response. All of these changes look great to me, thank you once again for the astute analysis gandalf!
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|