![]() |
![]() |
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Quentingolmo
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 525
![]() |
Agreed to all. Looks like another successful chapter!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Quentingolmo
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 525
![]() |
RP-SL-29.5: I just realized, we should change 'Mirkwood' here to 'the Greenwood' since when Oropher ruled there it was called by that name. We can discuss if the statement about the realm of Thranduil in the Third Age in Mirkwood at the end of the paragraph needs changing, but I think it is ok to leave it.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
RP-SL-29.5: I don't agree to this. At least it is clear that we have a compilation of later days. So the naming made be out of time. Like the use of Dol Amroth long before the death of Amroth.
Respectfully Findegil |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Quentingolmo
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 525
![]() |
The usage of Dol Amroth is always in the context of the future: 'In the lore of Dol Amroth.' This case of Mirkwood is used erroneously (before we even explain the name Mirkwood) as the current residence of the elvenking.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
RP-SL-29.5: Okay. I see you are right. BUt I think the article should not be used. It is not 'the Mirkwood' so it should not be 'the Greenwood'. Kapitalisation is enough to show that it is a name. If we want t ob be even more clear about that we should use the full name 'Greenwood the Great', which I think is the best solution.
RP-SL-40b: Sorry for coming up with this again, but I found that I used the complete passage later at the end of 'Tal-Elmar', where I place the discussion about the Middle-men. Therefore I would eliminat it here: Quote:
Findegil Last edited by Findegil; 06-05-2018 at 06:15 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Quentingolmo
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 525
![]() |
RP-SL-29.5: Agreed to Greenwood the Great.
RP-SL-40b: I see why you removed it, but I think that once this sentence is gone, the antecedent to the 'This' is gone as well. The way this new version flows is somewhat choppy. It sounds at first like Galadriel and Celeborn establish a settlement, and then it says it one was founded aftrwards. I think to remedy this all we need to do is add 'settlement' after the 'This' like so: Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
RP-SL-40b: Agreed.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |