![]() |
![]() |
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
![]() |
#1 | |||||
Late Istar
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,224
![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I'm not necessarily proposing that we adopt my version as the framework. However, I think the differences are instructive - they show, for one thing, that radically different approaches are possible. And I think this is important. When one person presents a text for discussion, it's easy to, without meaning to, get locked into certain choices that were tacitly or unconsciously made in preparing that text, and to assume that those choices were inevitable. In other words, I think it's worth taking a step back and considering, in broad strokes, the structure of the chapter, and which sources to base that structure on. I don't mean, by any of this, to undermine or disparage the work you and Findegil have done lately - on the contrary, I think it's great. But, as Findegil can tell you, I like to proceed with great caution and deliberation! So, I'm going to try to find some time in the next few days to examine Findegil's draft in detail, compare it to mine, and hopefully come up with some insights into the structure of the chapter. I do think that we should not take that structure for granted, and I don't think we should be unwilling to consider other alternatives. As a general comment on content (as opposed to structure), it appears that Findegil has obviously adopted a lot more of Myths Transformed than I did, whereas I have adopted quite a bit from the Lost Tales that I don't see in Findegil's draft. I'm inclined to be cautious on both counts, but I do think that Findegil has identified several good passages to use from MT. Do the two of you have any thoughts on the Lost Tales sections I introduced? I was quite uncertain about them when I wrote this draft, and could probably be persuaded that they shouldn't be used, but I am rather fond of them. Last edited by Aiwendil; 10-10-2017 at 09:28 PM. |
|||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |||
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
BD-03: Your addition from MT, Text VI is a great in it self. I always had in mind that we had such a passage that clearly identifies Melkor and Manwë with special thoughts of Eru. As we are told that Ainur were the of prings of Eru’s thoughts these is a perfect exemplification. But as you mentioned already we might better use it in the Valaquenta. What do you think of this placement and editing:
Quote:
Posted by Aiwendil: Quote:
I agree on your approach to look from a helicopter view on the structure to avoid probably unconscious pre-elections. Posted by Aiwendil: Quote:
About the LT additions: I don’t think that your impression is fully correct: BD-LT-01 / VT-EX-02: The placement and editing seems a bit different, but the contenet is the same. BD-LT-02 and your next add about Melkor hearing the noise of their labor and BD-LT-03 are all included in what I called VT-EX-03. VT-EX-04: This addition from LT you did not use. Your addition from LT in §25 of AAm and BD-LT-04, BD-LT-05, BD-LT-06, BD-LT-07, BD-LT-08, BD-LT-09 and BD-LT-11, BD-LT-12 and BD-LT-13 are all included in the longe addition that I took that starts with VT-EX-05 and end at VT-EX-15. BD-LT-10: This I missed probably. But I agree that it should be included. And like your editing with the fitting surrounding. But for the time being I will restrain from putting into my version as long as the question of the structure is not clear. So you see that at least concerning the LT additions we are not that fare sundered. Respectfully Findegil |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Late Istar
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,224
![]() ![]() |
BD-03: I agree, this is better in the Valaquenta. I'm a little concerned about the stylistic dissonance between the Valaquenta and the more informal MT text, but perhaps we should discuss that in the Valaquenta thread.
BD-16: Right. Sorry, I did not look carefully enough at my own text, nor recall our previous discussions, before posting it! Quote:
All right, I will find some time to study the texts more carefully, and then give you my thoughts. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||||||
Late Istar
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,224
![]() ![]() |
I'm working on a long post comparing our versions, discussing the general approach, and then getting into some particulars. This should be done soon, but in the meantime I thought I'd just mention a few typos and (I believe) some missing editorial marks that I noticed in Findegil's text.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Quentingolmo
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 525
![]() |
I apologize, re-reading my comment it sounds very brusque and rude. Please forgive my curtness Aiwendil! I was just somewhat confused that it felt like you were rejecting our version, which was obviously not the case at all. So sorry about that
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Late Istar
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,224
![]() ![]() |
No need to apologize; I didn't think you were being rude at all!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | ||
Late Istar
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,224
![]() ![]() |
Apologies in advance for the length of this.
I am going to first present my synopses of both my text and Findegil's. I indicate here only the major sections, not noting smaller additions from other sources. The idea is just to have the basic structure of each text visible in a digestible form for comparison. Findegil's text: Quote:
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |