![]() |
|
|
|
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
|
|
|
#1 | ||||||
|
Quentingolmo
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 525
![]() |
Ok, I have read throught the proposed changes by Findegil and Maedhros, and I have some comments.
Of Finwe and Miriel I have only two comments for this section. Firstly, I at first wondered why the (far more substantial) Statute of Finwe and Miriel text was not used throughout to greatly expand this section, but I noticed that the very same text is referenced in the chapter itself. This made me think that these additions were not added bc the Statute is to be included along with Laws and Customs in VOLUME III: THE LORE OF THE WISE. If this is so, then I wholeheartedly agree. If, however, this is not to be included later, then I see no reason not to give the much fuller accounts here. Secondly, In DoV-FM-03 I was confused as to the reason for the inclusion of this portion of the Statute. As there were no other inclusions, this seemed odd as the singular exception, and indeed turns the footnote into a full page of text. In addition, there was no direction by Tolkien to include this account here, so I am confused as to why it was done. Of Feanor and the Unchaining of Melkor in the paragraph of DoV-UM-03 there was a change to LQ that was left out of your version: Quote:
Quote:
I made an addition from AAm: Quote:
Quote:
Of the Darkening of Valinor I just have a question. Is it Ungoliante or Ungoliant? Also, in the LQ version, Ungoliant and Melkor split up, but in all others they remain together and kill the trees as a unit. is LQ the way to go? Minor note: Quote:
DoV-DV-03: at the end of this paragraph is the bit: Quote:
DoV-DV-05: This bit is odd, but it might be better to simply remove it. Feanor is the only one of the Noldor who would require the clemency of Manwe, and his presence is told later. Of the Rape of the Silmarils DoV-RS-04: The words "in Aman" should be added, as it is elsewhere said that the Elves had been killed in the hither lands, which is why Orome brought them weapons. Of the Thieves' Quarrel Looks good! That was everything I saw, the rest looks good. |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Quentingolmo
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 525
![]() |
just putting in a reminder here that the Shibboleth additions about Sarmo must be removed, due to their inclusion in chapter 6.
In addition, the addition of the draining of Kullulin and Silindrin in the Darkening of Valinor section. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
And we have to remove Celeborn from the addition that descrips Galadriels stay in Aqualondë.
Respectfully Findegil |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Quentingolmo
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 525
![]() |
Where was this addition made? I saw no post about it on this thread.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Quentingolmo
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 525
![]() |
Also, I have been attempting to make a draft of the Shibboleth of Feanor text for Volume III and I belive it is too intertwined with the story itself to stand alone, as much therein is not used elsewhere. Therefore, I think we need to take up more of it in these chapters. In addition, there is something that the SF changed from the LQ version: Feanor was already full-grown by the time Miriel passed to Mandos. This changes many things in this, and also in the Laws and Customs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
If I never posted this change here, than it was only in my private copy of the text that I added it, sorry for that. Nonetheless here is how I would deal with Galadriel in this chapter. Since Celeborn must be a Sindar per LotR we have to change DoV-UN-00.5:
Quote:
Findegil |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Quentingolmo
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 525
![]() |
The end of the paragraph given before this insertion, there are other paragraphs which were never proposed. Galadriel was not mentioned in paragraph 51, so what additions are there before this? I saw in your plain text version that you had included some, but I would like to see the full sourcing. I see that they are from the Shibboleth, which is good, bc I think we need to use more of that. The real challenge of this section will be getting the s > þ change into the narrative.
Last edited by ArcusCalion; 10-06-2017 at 11:42 AM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|