![]() |
![]() |
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
DE-EX-10 and DE-EX-11: I had some doubts about the naming of Durin here, but I am open to retake the mentionings of Durin. I would only remove the last:
Quote:
DE-EX-11: gramatical issue: Agreed. The Legolas/Pengolod issue: Our text is an amalgament of diffrent texts, so I wouldn't say it is a problem. Respecfully Findegil |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Quentingolmo
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 525
![]() |
awesome, looks good!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
I have forgotten to add one important bit from Of Dwarves and Men:
Quote:
Respectfully Findegil |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Quentingolmo
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 525
![]() |
I would hesitate to chop up Of Dwarves and Men, as I have said before. I feel that by removing all the references to the Third Age, we are gutting an essentially complete work for no reason, especially when we can easily include it in its entirety in Volume II.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
I don't think that Of Dwarves and Men is useable complete in volume 2. If at all the essay would fit in volume 3. Of Dwarves and Men is in over all a linguistic essay. But its story content ranges from the awakening of Dwarves to the end of the Third Age.
But I anyhow think that the content is needed in many parts. Pushed in part 3 it is fully out of sequence. I agree that the forward references that are included are valuable. But the question have we to remove them all? In The Silmarillion we as well such forward references. Not over much but a few are there. Respectfully Findegil |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
Okay at long last I have made up my mind about the footnote concerning the additional dwarves add by Ilúvatar. I think they are needed. Therefore I propose the following:
Quote:
Respectfully Findegil |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | ||
Late Istar
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,224
![]() ![]() |
For this chapter, I produced two texts, separating "Of Aule and the Dwarves" from "Of the Ents and the Eagles".
The basic text is the QS77, with only a few alterations and additions. I used "AD" for the text "Of Aule and the Dwarves". As usual: Bold Text = source information, comments and remarks {example} = text that should be deleted [example] = normalised text, normally only used for general changes <source example> = additions with source information example = text inserted for grammatical or metrical reason /example/ = outline expansion Quote:
AD-01: This opening paragraph of AD was omitted from QS77. AD-02: Christopher Tolkien says in XI that his father eventually settled on using the formal, "you", throughout AD, whereas QS77 uses "thou". I have reverted all instances of "thou" to "you". AD-03: As AD-02 AD-04: As AD-02 AD-05: As AD-02 AD-06: Changed per Tolkien’s emendation to LQ1. AD-07: Taking the later version of the statement about the Dwarf-fathers returning to life. AD-08: The "Longbeards" were later the Dwarves of Khazad-dum, not of Belegost. AD-09: Removal of Aelfwine. For my text of "Anaxartaron Onyalië", with QS77 as the basis, I will only indicate the beginning, end, and changes, as the rest follows QS77. Quote:
EE-01: Per XI; ‘betray’ in QS77 was an editorial alteration of ‘bewray’. EE-02: Per XI, as EE-01; ‘Iluvatar’ in QS77 for original ‘Eru’. EE-03: As EE-02. Last edited by Aiwendil; 10-09-2017 at 07:04 PM. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |