|  | 
|  | 
| Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page | 
|  | 
|  03-14-2016, 04:19 PM | #1 | 
| Curmudgeonly Wordwraith Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Ensconced in curmudgeonly pursuits 
					Posts: 2,515
				      | 
			
			While I do appreciate the honesty, I suppose, I don't at all appreciate the travesty they made of The Hobbit - a genuinely wonderful story for all ages that generations of readers have passed down to their sons and daughters in turn like a family heirloom (or mathom, if you wish).  Offering what amounts to a half-arsed apology afterwards rings quite hollow, and it is disheartening. They didn't know what the hell they were doing and it shows. They slapped a bunch of disparate elements together, made up or transported characters and put them where they didn't belong, and generally made a CGI molehill out of a mountain of a tale. I hope to Eru no one makes another damned Middle-earth movie ever again. 
				__________________ And your little sister's immaculate virginity wings away on the bony shoulders of a young horse named George who stole surreptitiously into her geography revision. | 
|   |   | 
|  03-15-2016, 06:21 AM | #2 | 
| Ghost Prince of Cardolan Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Lonely Isle 
					Posts: 706
				   |  Thanks for the link 
			
			Thanks for that link, Michael! This information is already known to people on the Downs; and I fully understand your point of view, Morthron. An 'apology' isn't much if it was only made in the extended edition DVD of the last film.   What annoys me is knowing that far younger and far more inexperienced people, given a fraction of the money that was spent here, could have produced something far better...   | 
|   |   | 
|  03-15-2016, 05:52 PM | #3 | |
| Curmudgeonly Wordwraith Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Ensconced in curmudgeonly pursuits 
					Posts: 2,515
				      | Quote: 
 He strayed here and there, but his hubris was often reined in by cooler heads ("No, Pete, Arwen should not be cutting off orc heads in Helms Deep!"), but much of the esthetic of the film, the cinematography and a greater part of the dialogue (whether or not the original character voiced the lines) was basically true to Tolkien's Middle-earth. Certainly, one can be annoyed at the character assassinations of Denethor and Faramir, the whole wasted 15 minutes of Aragorn falling off a cliff, then frenching his horse, or the entire "Arwen is dying" idiocy, but, for the most part, one got a sense of the depth and breadth of Middle-earth. If anything, his energy was commendable. However, ten Oscars later, PJ was a different sort of director. Whether or not he forced out Guillermo del Toro (and the conspiracy theorist in me thinks he did, and GdT was simply too much of a gentleman to say what really happened), PJ decided that he alone should direct the films. Again, hubris overpowered common sense: he ignored all the genuine humor and quaintness of Tolkien's tale, and in its place threw in troll snot, a diva operatic GoblinKing, unendurably long chutes 'n' ladders chases, sophomoric elf/dwarf sexual jokes, and bird-droppings on the hat of a psychedelicized wizard; admitting he had little time, he ignored the bigatures and extensive modeling and rendering that lent a sense of realism to the films, and instead opted for overbearing CGI that basically sucked the life out of Middle-earth; and worst of all, he absconded with the original plot and dialogue and threw it in the garbage, choosing in his pomposity and appalling effrontery to create characters and write the script with merely a nod to the original. To quote Christopher Tolkien: "They eviscerated the book by making it an action movie for young people aged 15 to 25." 
				__________________ And your little sister's immaculate virginity wings away on the bony shoulders of a young horse named George who stole surreptitiously into her geography revision. Last edited by Morthoron; 03-15-2016 at 05:56 PM. | |
|   |   | 
|  03-15-2016, 06:19 PM | #4 | |
| Ghost Prince of Cardolan Join Date: Aug 2012 
					Posts: 785
				   | Quote: 
 I find it odd that it seems like the narrative adaptation involved far less focus-tested corporate box-ticking mandated into it for The Lord of the Rings than for The Hobbit considering that it was on the former that Jackson was the much less tested director. Perhaps it already ticked enough boxes on its own so less needed to be added/exaggerated. For whatever reason New Line on its own seems to have been far less controlling than WB. 
				__________________ "Since the evening of that day we have journeyed from the shadow of Tol Brandir." "On foot?" cried Éomer. | |
|   |   | 
|  03-16-2016, 02:42 AM | #5 | |
| Wisest of the Noldor | Quote: 
 
				__________________ "Even Nerwen wasn't evil in the beginning." –Elmo. | |
|   |   | 
|  03-16-2016, 07:41 AM | #6 | 
| Ghost Prince of Cardolan Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Lonely Isle 
					Posts: 706
				   |  We'll only know the truth later 
			
			To what you mentioned earlier about Jackson's LotR films, Morthoron, I would add: reducing Sauron to a disembodied eye on top of a tower; making Saruman turn evil and produce urks at very short notice; making Gandalf's  removing evil influences from Theoden resemble something from The Exorcist; sending Elves to Helm's Deep; using the Dead to win the Battle of the Pelennor Fields; and having Gollum succeed in turning Frodo against Sam.   I read with interest what you had to say, Zigûr and Nerwen. The problem is that only later will we know the truth about whether 'pressure' or 'interference' from the studio, whatever one calls it, was a factor in what appeared as Jackson's Hobbit films. I agree with you, Nerwen, if it was true that Jackson stood up to New Line regarding the first set of films, but did not to Warner for the second. It stands to reason that a director with a commercially successful set of films under his belt would have been better able to stand up to the relevant studio when filming another set.   | 
|   |   | 
|  03-16-2016, 09:49 PM | #7 | |
| Ghost Prince of Cardolan Join Date: Aug 2012 
					Posts: 785
				   | Quote: 
 It's also probably the fact that, to my knowledge, he never wanted to direct the film(s) in the first place. These things seem to combine to form a director who simply isn't going to go to the trouble of putting up much of a fight with the studio. 
				__________________ "Since the evening of that day we have journeyed from the shadow of Tol Brandir." "On foot?" cried Éomer. Last edited by Zigûr; 03-16-2016 at 09:58 PM. | |
|   |   | 
|  03-17-2016, 09:09 AM | #8 | 
| Regal Dwarven Shade Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: A Remote Dwarven Hold 
					Posts: 3,593
				    |  I take a different tack 
			
			I lay most of the blame for things on Jackson and not the studio.  No doubt the studio was a baleful influence, but I've seen too much about how the execrable deviations in the LOTR trilogy were mostly Jackson's doing to cut him any kind of slack when it comes to the mess that was The Hobbit.
		 
				__________________ ...finding a path that cannot be found, walking a road that cannot be seen, climbing a ladder that was never placed, or reading a paragraph that has no... | 
|   |   | 
|  | 
| 
 | 
 | 
|  |