![]() |
|
|
|
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Newly Deceased
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1
![]() |
Though many here have theorized against the Eye as being Sauron's only physical form, I would like to mention a curious idea that has come to mind. Imagine Sauron as the Necromancer having a wraith-like form in the Hobbit book but afterwards returned to his homeland of Mordor to build his armies and regain his power. I believe fully that the Eye is his shade's form manifested. No matter what Smeagol said of his torture in Mordor, this Eye is the form in which Sauron takes shape since any spirit of his order (like Gandalf) can choose their body. The Eye doesn't bark around orders to every Orc, man, and slave under his control. That would be rediculus. Much like any king or lord, his advisers do the dirty work and speak for him on common errands to his subjects.
This body he has taken is not simply the Eye though. Sauron's mouth (his top human errand boy) is a speaker to his army and even talks to Aragorn on the battlefield since that point is an important moment that the direct speaker for Sauron must be at. Maybe the Mouth is the only thing that speaks telepathically to the Eye inside the Dark Tower. The Eye is Sauron! The Mouth or Sauron speaks, the Eye sees all, and what i find very cool but no one seems to notice is that the nine Ring Wraiths are his NINE remaining fingers...... This common theme of having a body parts being different characters but all a part of the bigger picture is very interesting. Sauron's power, much like any administration, is weaker without followers. The Eye is the mind. The body of administration does the mind's work. If Smeagol was tortured in Mordor by anyone besides orcs, it was the nine wraiths who could be taken as the quote by Smeagol about the Dark Lord's fingers. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | ||||
|
Gruesome Spectre
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Heaven's doorstep
Posts: 8,039
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Aragorn in the books notes that Sauron does not allow his name to be "spelt or spoken" by his servants, and that's in keeping with his desire to be both king and god to them. Having a personal name by which he was known could, in his mind, have detracted from the aura of awe and terror he wished to inspire, Therefore, why not have a fearsome, but impersonal symbol for his troops to regard? Quote:
As for the body part analogy, how does that fit with Saruman and his White Hand? And by the way, welcome to the Downs!
__________________
Music alone proves the existence of God. |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 785
![]() ![]() |
Sauron was never an Eye. I think Letter 246 and Gollum's remark put this beyond doubt. From the end of the Second Age onwards, when incarnate, he looked like an unnaturally large man with burning skin and nine fingers. The Eye was his symbol and how his psychic presence was perceived by those who encountered him in or through the unseen world or how its manifestation was interpreted by those who observed his power (see the flash from the summit of Barad-dûr witnessed by Sam in Mordor).
Sauron did not act through agents and emissaries like the Mouth of Sauron and the Nazgûl because he was some giant telepathic eye but rather because there was absolutely no need for him to ever put himself into personal danger by confronting his enemies directly. His (staged) abandonment of Dol Guldur is testament to this. By the Third Age it had become a time consuming and demanding process for Sauron to become incarnate: he had had to do so quickly after his old body was lost in Númenor, and now he had to do so again. The Ainur could become incarnate however they pleased (Yavanna as a tree, for instance) but I don't think it at any stage behooved Sauron's interests to become incarnate as an isolated body part - he could not have worn his own ring had he recovered it, for starters. We know that he could no longer assume a fair and pleasing form; is it possible that, like Morgoth before him, his 'Dark Lord' body was now the only form he could take?
__________________
"Since the evening of that day we have journeyed from the shadow of Tol Brandir." "On foot?" cried Éomer. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Shade of Carn Dûm
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Toronto
Posts: 479
![]() |
Quote:
See also Gollum’s description in The Two Towers where Gollum says, “He has only four [fingers] on the Black Hand, but they are enough.” In the films Saruman tells Gandalf that Sauron isn’t yet able to “take physical form,” but that is an invention by the film writers. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Wisest of the Noldor
|
Welcome to the Downs, Morzan!
![]() –Now, about your idea: the thing is, you can’t justify a whole elaborate theory simply by referring back to your own belief in it. Yes, you can think what you like, and you can share your thoughts with us, and all that– but if you’re going to put them forward for serious consideration, as you seem to be, then I’m afraid you have to come up with actual supporting evidence. (But please don’t think I’m picking on you– what I’ve just said is pretty much “Nerwen’s Standard Lecture to Newbies”.)
__________________
"Even Nerwen wasn't evil in the beginning." –Elmo. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | ||
|
Gruesome Spectre
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Heaven's doorstep
Posts: 8,039
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Music alone proves the existence of God. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | ||
|
Wisest of the Noldor
|
Something I forgot to say earlier–
Quote:
Quote:
As you see, I don’t think it can be reasonably claimed that’s anything but a concrete description. That’s basically the problem with that whole side of the argument: it rests on assuming total literalism in some cases and the reverse in others, without ever looking at the context.
__________________
"Even Nerwen wasn't evil in the beginning." –Elmo. Last edited by Nerwen; 06-30-2013 at 10:08 PM. Reason: added comment |
||
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|