WW LXXXVIII: What Lies in the Dark (Game Thread) - The Barrow-Downs Discussion Forum

Nogrod · 05-11-2011, 02:05 PM

Sorry. I had some frustrating problems with my mobile internet-card... Those are nice and handy but not too reliable.

Anyway. I decided to take first a look at yesterDay's voting as none had done that. And it is interesting. Here it is.

early vote Lhuna -> Lottie
- 2 hrs. Zil -> Lottie2
-.13 Lottie -> Zil
-.00 Fea -> Nog
-.00 Nog -> Lhuna
+.01 tp -> Zil2

Not voted Nerwen, Shasta, wilwa.

Now this tie looks like an interesting one. So did tp know the situation? Was it a deliberate tie and to what end? To save Lottie looks like the obvious reason (he has defended her all the game through I think), but saving an innocent or a bad Lottie?

If there were no baddies at stake yesterDay (near lynching), a tie would have been a bad idea to them as a no-lynch doesn't harvest our numbers.

If there was a baddie in danger, then they would have wished either to outvote the baddie or as the final reach create a tie.

Now of course there is an added factor, that one isn't quite sure if there will be others still voting (although on +.01 one should be quite sure).

So just asking you tp, why to go that far as to make it a no-lynch to save Lottie?

EDIT: X'd with pleasantly many...

Inziladun · 05-11-2011, 02:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nogrod

Sorry. I had some frustrating problems with my mobile internet-card... Those are nice and handy but not too reliable.

Anyway. I decided to take first a look at yesterDay's voting as none had done that. And it is interesting. Here it is.

early vote Lhuna -> Lottie
- 2 hrs. Zil -> Lottie2
-.13 Lottie -> Zil
-.00 Fea -> Nog
-.00 Nog -> Lhuna
+.01 tp -> Zil2

Not voted Nerwen, Shasta, wilwa.

Now this tie looks like an interesting one. So did tp know the situation? Was it a deliberate tie and to what end? To save Lottie looks like the obvious reason (he has defended her all the game through I think), but saving an innocent or a bad Lottie?

A Lottie-lynch might yield some clues.

Hm. Two votes for Nerwen, who's been fairly enigmatic to me thus far. One for Lottie, and one for Nog.

x/d with tp- Why's he so apathetic all of a sudden?

05-11-2011, 02:05 PM	#1
Nogrod Flame of the Ainulindalë Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Wearing rat's coat, crowskin, crossed staves in a field behaving as the wind behaves Posts: 9,308	Sorry. I had some frustrating problems with my mobile internet-card... Those are nice and handy but not too reliable. Anyway. I decided to take first a look at yesterDay's voting as none had done that. And it is interesting. Here it is. early vote Lhuna -> Lottie - 2 hrs. Zil -> Lottie2 -.13 Lottie -> Zil -.00 Fea -> Nog -.00 Nog -> Lhuna +.01 tp -> Zil2 Not voted Nerwen, Shasta, wilwa. Now this tie looks like an interesting one. So did tp know the situation? Was it a deliberate tie and to what end? To save Lottie looks like the obvious reason (he has defended her all the game through I think), but saving an innocent or a bad Lottie? If there were no baddies at stake yesterDay (near lynching), a tie would have been a bad idea to them as a no-lynch doesn't harvest our numbers. If there was a baddie in danger, then they would have wished either to outvote the baddie or as the final reach create a tie. Now of course there is an added factor, that one isn't quite sure if there will be others still voting (although on +.01 one should be quite sure). So just asking you tp, why to go that far as to make it a no-lynch to save Lottie? EDIT: X'd with pleasantly many... __________________ Upon the hearth the fire is red Beneath the roof there is a bed; But not yet weary are our feet...