Mandos Thread: DEAD ONLY! - WW LXXXVI

[Nogrod]

Did you look also as what kind of suspicions they were on Boro, on what kind of a situation, and did they turn into votes?

I mean you can just say "X looks fishy" in a point when it is of no consequence or you can push to lynch him adding a full-out case against him when he is already under heavy scrutiny...

I mean I still think Boro is a wolf.

Glirdy's vote for Boro makes Glirdy look better now as the wolves would not make wolf-on-wolves on such a Day. Also as one who played two games in a row with him as a wolf, I remember him managing to get me lynched both times prematurely by backing me too enthusiastically while making cardinal errors himself... This time he seems not too nervous and his greatest involvement in defending someone I think was for innocent Wilwa.

If those two are correct, then from the shortlist of Greenie, Sally & Nerwen two would have to be wolves. Interestingly enough there is also one vote cast between those three, namely Greenie's vote for Sally.

So Boro, Greenie & Nerwen as the wolves?

And whatever the scenario, Greenie's vote for Sally kind of makes Nerwen a wolf (no wolf-on wolves toDay) by default.

I'm not too confident about that but I do think it earns a notification as a possibility.


Why not confident?

I could be wrong with Glirdy to be sure. but there is also another matter.

That is: I wouldn't rule out at least one fake revelation. Basically I'm thinking of this:

Originally Posted by Greenie

Elra - Believing her claim for now. I'm still unsure of whether there is any sense in Hunter reveals in general, but she's certainly off the hook - and in a game of this sort (or any sort) fake-revealing as the hunter is not really a smart move anyway.

I do agree here with Greenie that revealing as the hunter isn't kind of what the hunters are there for - disregarding certain special situations where it might be a good idea (which this certainly isn't!!!). But it might go both ways.

Elron is a relatively new player to the game and might not just see why it would be instrumental at this point for the hunter to stay hidden and hope to get killed having a decent chance to get a wolf with her.

But it is also possible that, after looking at the amount of suspicion and votes coming her way lately that she had been instructed by her seniors to fake-reveal as no seasoned hunter woud then counter-reveal to expose her/himself - and thus she would duck the gallows toDay. And toDay is what matters to the wolves.


Also I see you seem to trust Anguirel without a question made. If you look at my earlier post about Ang (not only the one saying Ang is a wolf, but especially the earlier one where I tried to make sense of his posting earlier toDay), you can see why I do not buy it without reservations. He might be true for sure, especially if he thought the innocents have already bagged a wolf (although even then his maths would suck - which he pre-emptively said - and make his move a bit reckless one, which I'm not used to see from Ang).

But with him the question really arises, wold the real ranger stood back in silence? That's a hard one. It's more or less clear the real hunter would have lad low if someone fake-revealed at this kind of a situation, but with the ranger it's not that clear.

Ahh... I see lots of posting going on. Reading then.


PS. Is your 'Downs working really slow? Mine is...