Quote:
Originally Posted by Inzil
Now, perhaps we can put Shasta's theory to rest.
At least there's no kill toNight.
|
I can't help but pull a
Lottie here and say that this seems oddly showy for
Inzil (
Wilwa's post above is similar, but gives off a different sort of feel than this casual one-liner). However, I've been after
Inzil a lot, so maybe I'm just biased here.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inzil
Looking back now, both Greenie and Sally, two of the remaining three voters, had indicated they would not be around. That left Eomer, who wasn't likely to vote for himself at that point even if he'd been innocent.
|
...And this looks like
Inzil is pulling the most mundane parts out of people's posts to respond to to look helpful.

My next comment will be about someone else other than jittery
Inzil, I promise.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nerwen
Only if he's really cleaned up his act since last time.
|
What's that supposed to mean,
dear one?
Skipping over the drivel in #255 like I said I would...
I notice the only thing
Eomer's put forth today is that he agrees with
Nerwen about the possibility of wolves holding their votes until late, and doesn't see anything Seerish about
Nog. It's been a while since I played with
Eomer, but I seem to remember him being more... involved, as a wolf. He's striking me as 'bored ordo' right now, but I could still vote him on principle! *mean look*
Quote:
Originally Posted by Agan
It just seemed so useless to suggest we try to figure out whom the wolves targeted.
|
And I
still disagree with you.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inzil
Perhaps we can technically "afford to lynch another quiet player", but that doesn't mean we should.
|
Why shouldn't we,
Inzil? It's a given fact that quiet players are harder to catch at anything than loud players simply because of the amount of talking they do. Plus I'm for lynching lurkers on principle and always have been.

I'm not saying I'm going to today (though I am considering it;
Eomer for his constant "I'll say more" and not living up to it]), but I don't understand why you seem to be so against it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greenie
I can't help thinking that her ”going on principles” -vote would have been the perfect move for a wolf:
|
I don't really see why having principles automatically makes you wolvish.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inzil
TEW has not done himself any favours in my view, and I can see the temptation to vote for him. Seems too easy though, and I'm not convinced he's not merely a busy innocent.
|
TEW as a vote is "too easy", yet voting for someone who hasn't shown up today (Kath)
isn't? Need I remind you that that's practically identical to how I got lynched
as the Seer last game?
Inzil is currently topping my "will vote for" list, followed by
Eomer. In fact, why don't I just make that list...
Would like to vote for -
Inzil
Eomer
TEW
Agan
Won't be voting for -
Wilwa
Lottie
Greenie
Currently neutral on -
Pitch
Nerwen
Would be a principle vote, but probably won't be voting unless circumstances change -
Sally
Kath
Form