Quote:
Originally Posted by Shastanis Althreduin
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phantom
But instead I picked Rune as my Seer and so in my ruse I claimed that he and Lommy were innocent, along with Kath (I added Kath because I thought three dreams would look more powerful). What that tells me is that it is nearly a guarantee that Rune, Lommy, or Kath is an Elf, and likely that Rune or Lommy is.
|
Only if the Elves didn't buy your Seer-act for the specific reason that you named at least one as an innocent. I'm not at all saying I disagree with you here, Phantom - in fact I would be surprised if Lommy in particular wasn't an Elf at this point - but saying "nearly a guarantee" is pushing things a bit far, I think. |
True. However, they didn't buy
Foley as the Seer either. Look at this list:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Folwren
Probably Innocent
Nerwen
Inzil
Lommy
Less certain but leaning towards innocent
Shasta
Legate
Phantom
Kath
Also less certain, but leaning towards guilty this time
Rune
Mira
I have a guilty feeling about:
Greenie
Steve
Now PLEASE don't freak out about Greenie's name being there. I KNOW I voted for her, but it was only after I voted for her and then started reading more posts (remember, I'm way behind due to Day2) and she started posting more posts that I got a bad, bad, bad feeling about her. I feel something is wrong. I don't have time to go back and figure it out now, but I wanted to put out my list in case any of you reps really cared.
|
And
Foley's later comment about me must have looked very Seerish. So why wasn't she killed? Is it because the Elves reasoned that she couldn't have dreamed
Greenie plus three innocents? But she makes it pretty clear that her suspicion of
Greenie was based on the latter's posting only– and, after all, she voted for her.
09-23-2010, 09:56 PM
Threaded Mode