![]() |
![]() |
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Wight
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Mordor
Posts: 150
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
I am Annatar, the Lord of Gifts. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
|
I said he may have had to wait, because Tolkien does not mention Ecthelion's receiving the same treatment.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,036
![]() ![]() |
I tend to doubt the number of slain Balrogs -- according to The Book of Lost Tales version of The Fall of Gondolin -- was going to hold for the later Quenta Silmarillion.
Unfortunately Tolkien abandoned the 1951 updated (long prose) version of this tale... although at that point Balrogs still existed in great numbers at least (externally speaking). Later Tolkien imagined that, at most, seven ever existed; though in any case he did not revise every relevant passage that implied large numbers of Balrogs... ... just to keep us guessing ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Stormdancer of Doom
|
I wonder: would he have come up with some sort of "Lesser Balrog" order, and left Seven Balrog Captains in command over numerous, lesser Ensign Balrogs; perhaps renaming the Ensign Balrogs to something less impressive.
Perhaps it reminds me of the spiders. There is Ungoliant; and Shelob; and there are Lesser Spiders, that make the southern borders of Dorthonion a nasty place, and Mirkwood too, later. Of course this is all rambling and unsupported whimsy on my part.
__________________
...down to the water to see the elves dance and sing upon the midsummer's eve. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,036
![]() ![]() |
I've even read the suggestion (not here) that maybe Tolkien, late in life, 'intended' to have Glorfindel fight a notable demon... but something that is not a Balrog specifically. Like, perhaps a notable Maia in orc form.
The suggestion was based on the late Glorfindel texts, because Tolkien used 'demon' throughout instead of Balrog, and in at least one instance, for some reason changed the word Balrog to demon. I must admit I have no great answer as to why Tolkien would revise the word Balrog to demon -- but also no great answer as to why, if indeed he meant to revise the encounter in this way, he wasn't more explicit about it (though granted these are still, to him, his private papers). Anyway, I don't buy it myself ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Flame Imperishable
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Right here
Posts: 3,928
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
__________________
Welcome to the Barrow Do-owns Forum / Such a lovely place
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |