WW LXXIII: Arkham Asylum: Holding Cells(Game Thread)

[satansaloser2005]

Originally Posted by Nerwen

I do not have time or inclination to go through that post of Sally's on Durelin in detail. The points on her contradicting herself are okay (except for the one below), but apart from that it's mostly just a very long-winded way of saying she's creepy and under-the-radar.



Truly... considering she hasn't voted at all yet.





It may be my paranoia talking, but this really sounds like you know perfectly well I'm innocent... and that you're busy setting up Durelin as toMorrow's lynch, or as an alternative one for toDay. (Durelin has to be a wolf if I'm not? Not might be, but has to be?)



It's Day Three, remember? We can't afford to lynch someone just for that.

EDIT:added comment.

In order.

Fair enough, as that's unfortunately most of what it was. That's the problem.

Oh, snap. Sorry, that was in reference to yesterDay's vote. Thanks for catching it.

Don't you wish. I'm just saying that if I am wrong about you, there's no way I'm wrong about Durelin. Even I'm not that stupid. (Shut it, kthnxbye.) You may even be partners together, but the odds of at least one of you being lupine are staggering.

And I know. I'm just saying that if she happens to be innocent she's not doing anything to help us. I won't kill an innocent just for slacking (at least not just for that lol) but if she ends up on the winning side instead of someone who actually put out an effort I don't think it's fair. That's all.

Now stop putting words in my mouth. (And thank you for the correction.)


EDIT: x'd since the post I was replying to

[Nerwen]

Originally Posted by satansaloser2005

Fair enough, as that's unfortunately most of what it was. That's the problem.

Yet you then say–

Originally Posted by Sally

I'm just saying that if I am wrong about you, there's no way I'm wrong about Durelin.

EDIT:X'd with Sally.

[Durelin]

I'm labeling this as a sort of out-of-character post.

I wish people would discuss game politics after the fact rather than during. If you must discuss them with me, I will be happy to (okay, not really happy, but I'll do it) after the game.

[Nerwen]

Originally Posted by Durelin

I'm labeling this as a sort of out-of-character post.

I wish people would discuss game politics after the fact rather than during. If you must discuss them with me, I will be happy to (okay, not really happy, but I'll do it) after the game.

Just one last thing– what do you mean by "game politics"?

[Durelin]

Originally Posted by Nerwen

Just one last thing– what do you mean by "game politics"?

What is fair and isn't, who deserves to win and why, etc. Comes up way too often.