WW LXXIII: Arkham Asylum: Holding Cells(Game Thread)

[Nerwen]

Okay... I'll answer Nogrod and Sally together, then.

Originally Posted by Sally

Also, for some reason the fact that she said ‘wolves and cobblers’ rather than ‘wolves’ strikes me; it’s as if she knows Boro isn’t a wolf, so she needs to put up both possibilities.

Um... why would I have "needed" to, in that case? And Lottie thought (correctly) that he was a cobbler, so it seemed relevant.

And... much of the rest of Sally's post is: "Ooo, she defended herself against Lottie! She joked about Jonathan apples on Day One! Eeevilll!"

And finally, her defence of her voting yesterDay... I don't buy it.

Originally Posted by Sally, toDay

Erm, if you’ll notice, in my post #172 I said I’d looked at her and my suspicions had increased. I voted for her because in my opinion supporting a possible wolf lynch is better than throwing away a vote on you when I didn’t think it was likely you’d be the lynch of the Day.

You said:

Originally Posted by Sally, yesterDay

I'm thinking Kit; not only do I suspect her*, it appears others do too. Reassures me that I'm not completely crazy (or that others are too, but then again....) so I'm willing to take the risk as she's one of my top suspects.

And yet, before that you had simply been ambiguous about her.

Originally Posted by Sally

Oh, so me making a case based on creeps is guilty, but you doing it is all right? I see. Thanks so much for clearing that up. I was very confused. Then again, you’re the one voting an innocent.

I had already given my reasons for voting you at that point. And thanks for letting us all know you're innocent.

Originally Posted by Nogrod

First: "Yeah, and I might have just been having fun". Well yeah. But if you were just having fun and you are innocent would you have phrased it like that?

I was replying to an accusation of Lottie's (I think– this is from memory) where she said I "might" have been doing such-and-such.

Originally Posted by Nogrod

Secondly: "I was seeing how she'd react". Okay. It's an old and sometimes working idea to test someone you suspect by making an attack or open suspicion and waiting to see how the one you suspect reacts to that. But you said the reason for that "trial" was the fact that you didn't like how wilwa repeated her optimism.

Yes, exactly. What's your point? I suspected her somewhat, so I was testing her– already said so.

Originally Posted by Nogrod

Also I'm a bit confused with that case for "you went on me after I said I had internet problems". Some of us have internet problems, some of us live in different timezones (you Nerwen should know that!), some of us have more time while some of us have busier days, some of us have time to use for this in the afternoon, others in the evening and some at night etc.

I'm pretty sure I only mentioned that once, and only because I was in fact struck by the timing of her rather sudden attack on me.

Originally Posted by Nogrod

I'm just stating my feeling of you over-reacting to Sally's suspicions).

Look– why am I over-reacting? I asked her if she was ever going to make a proper case. She's spent most of the game making vague accusations, based on "feelings", and her vote yesterDay certainly required an explanation.

Edit:X'd since Nogrod at #219.