![]() |
|
|
|
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Sage & Onions
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Britain
Posts: 894
![]() |
Hmm Legate,
does 'never speak, never meet' mean just 'are never seen speaking or meeting in the books' or 'never ever spoke or met'? For example there are some characters that you can infer must have spoken together in the past (or would do so in the future) but don't have an on-page conversation. Would they count? Still stumped!!!
__________________
Rumil of Coedhirion |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 3,448
![]() ![]() |
Quote:
I mean Boromir and Faramir REALLY fit well but they obviously met... but we never see them speak
__________________
Morsul the Resurrected |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
A Voice That Gainsayeth
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: In that far land beyond the Sea
Posts: 7,431
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Oh no, no. Of course if it's clear that some characters have spoken to each other, like that Boromir-Faramir example, of course I would count it as if those two DID speak to each other. Use your common sense, there's no bluff in the riddle that would deny common logic. The two I have in mind really didn't, neither in the books nor any other time, only there is one subtle "but" in the "never speak". But that's just in case that everything else would fit and this one seemed a bit unfitting to you. But overall, no, Me and He never met and never spoke to each other.
__________________
"Should the story say 'he ate bread,' the dramatic producer can only show 'a piece of bread' according to his taste or fancy, but the hearer of the story will think of bread in general and picture it in some form of his own." -On Fairy-Stories |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
|
I'm currently thinking something involving Aragorn, Arvedui, and Malbeth, but it works better if "we" equals "me" and "other" and I can't quite figure out how "she" would fit in (the very fact that there's a specific woman involved makes this a lot harder!).
__________________
Got corsets? |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Sage & Onions
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Britain
Posts: 894
![]() |
Hi Legate,
OK then, I'll start eliminating my possiblities, probably wrong but... Aragorn is 'I', Sauron is Withnail, no, sorry, 'He', The One Ring is 'Other', Arwen is 'She' I'm just the second on His mind - Sauron is very interested in Aragorn He thought of Other more than of me - but more preoccupied by the Ring I'm just the second on His mind - especially after the Palantir-ing Although for me He meant more than She - Tricksy - Sauron meant more than Arwen? Certainly a more immediate concern, but rather un-gallant, no? Me and Him, so alike We - In a rather not-very-alike way, but I suppose both are great and effective leaders Touch the same iron, touch the same stone - both touched Anduril, stone, hmm, possibly somewhere in Minas Morgul??? We never speak, We never meet - Yup, (Palantir doesn't count) What tells you who We are? Our hands alone. - Both have distinctive hands - Sauron has but nine fingers, Aragorn has the hands of a healer. Not sure I'm convincing myself here!
__________________
Rumil of Coedhirion |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | ||||
|
A Voice That Gainsayeth
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: In that far land beyond the Sea
Posts: 7,431
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
But very right so, Rumil! Well done!
You have also correctly intepreted the particularities of the riddle. Quote:
but indeed, Sauron was Aragorn's deeper concern in the sense that he could have dropped his vocation and lived somewhere in peace in Rivendell, if he wanted, but he chose not to (I was thinking in the immediate context of Galadriel's "test of minds" and also Aragorn's half a century-long journeys in the Wilderness). Although, of course, even behind his conflict with the Enemy there was the background of doing this for the sake of Arwen, I am far from disvaluing Aragorn's motives.Quote:
).Quote:
Quote:
And the distinctive hands, perfectly correct. I must actually say that it was the part of the riddle I myself liked the most, because it seems funny to me in some way. Not sure why, it's just wonderful to think of it like that. Well, anyway! Your turn, Rumil, you definitely deserve it!
__________________
"Should the story say 'he ate bread,' the dramatic producer can only show 'a piece of bread' according to his taste or fancy, but the hearer of the story will think of bread in general and picture it in some form of his own." -On Fairy-Stories |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Wight of the Old Forest
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Unattended on the railway station, in the litter at the dancehall
Posts: 3,329
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Applause, applause - both to Legate for the riddle and Rumil for the solution! I had a hunch that Sauron might be one of the two (because of the nine fingers), but I'd never have guessed the rest. Very nice!
__________________
Und aus dem Erebos kamen viele seelen herauf der abgeschiedenen toten.- Homer, Odyssey, Canto XI |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Sage & Onions
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Britain
Posts: 894
![]() |
Wow,
I didn't think I had that one right at all! Great riddle Legate, I was trying to fit all the people with same types of unusual hands - Sauron/Frodo, Beren/that one-armed elf, Hands of a King, ringbearers etc etc! Was fairly sure that Sauron should be in there somewhere as he doesn't get out much by the 3rd Age. Stone - Palantiri in general, should have spotted that. Hmm, well, I'd better put my thinking cap on for the next one.......
__________________
Rumil of Coedhirion |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|