WWLXII: Dead Men Do Tell Tales

[Thinlómien]

You people are again assuming that the baddies assume the hunter does not bluff. *jumps up and down in irritation*

[Thinlómien]

Wait let me think. If Mira was evil, her mates would have wanted to lynch someone else too to make the game more even, unless all the other options were baddies too. If Mira was innocent, her mates would have wanted to... what? They could have advocated lynching someone else innocent to do better, or they could have advocated lynching Mira if their fellows were in danger. So Rikae may be right - knowing about Mira alone would not be that enlightening. Unless she turns out to be an aggressor, though, we may be able to read something from her behaviour. Ah, I don't know, this is difficult. I really doubt we will find out much by killing Annu again, or McCaber. Just somehow I think it won't lead to any information that is even half-concrete. There should be some more-dividing case that we could double-lynch someone and draw conclusions.

Originally Posted by Boro

I guess since I want to consider all options that makes me a cobbler?

*shrugs* Sometimes that's what cobblers do, sometimes that's what innocents do.

Originally Posted by Boro

I think knowing McCaber's role could be beneficial, considering Shasta and Nogrod were also in danger of being lynched. And in this set up, it would be less risk if mutineers wanted to protect other mutineers.

But it was Day1, and fair or not, people tend to prefer lynching people like McCab on Day1 rather than people like Nog or Shasta.

Originally Posted by Boro

You're asking yourself the wrong question which is why you're just confusing yourself. You're asking "Can Boro be manipulative and tricksy when he's evil?" Come on, we all know the answer to that, and that's why you don't feel safe trusting me.

Ask yourself...right now, at this moment, do you think based on the kill choices, the no kill, based on everything I have said, do you think I'm innocent? I expect only a yes or no back, no "yes but..." or "no but..." No thinking yourself into circles, just "yes" or "no."

Hahahaha, now I have a personal psychologist. But sadly my answer remains "yes, but" and you just have to accept it.

Originally Posted by Boro

Oh, and I'm not saying we need to double-kill today, I was just bringing up the possibility that since the wolves missed a chance yesterday, now we actually could take a chance to double-kill

Yes but now that they've missed it once we can "miss" ours at any point of the game just as well... but of course, who says we shouldn't take an advantage of being one step ahead of them in this game that is highly advantageous for them because of the mystery that surrounds everything?

Originally Posted by A Ghostly Green

First of all, a small thing, probably a mistake but I'd like it cleared just in case.

Eh?

Eh well I of course meant "goodie" not "baddie"...


edit: xed with all the three posts

[Nerwen]

I have to go now, so

++Gwath.

As usual, I'll try and be back before DL and may change my vote.

About double-lynching people: it's like this– we will have to eventually, because otherwise we're completely in the dark. However, every time we do, we're in effect giving the mutineers a free turn. I don't think we'll get more than a couple of shots at it, so we have to choose the time and the person very carefully.

EDIT:X'd with Lommy.

[Mithalwen]

Sorry I have been quiet. Just terminally befuddled. Will have another go... a concrete pieceo of information would be nice ... but it aint a decision to be taken lightly... and most of the people I want to check out are inconveniently still alive.