Werewolf LIII: The Republic

[Rune Son of Bjarne]

Nerwen: Why do you quote all those posts by Boromir without adding a comment to them, it would be much more helpful just linking to the posts you refer to in your last post. This way jut take up a lot of space and with such a build up I was quite surprised how little analysing there was done.
Anyways I am impressed with the lengths you go in order to make up your mind about a sertain link, I could never make my self do that.

[FONT=&quot]So are you an extremely helpful individual or are you just engaging in massive surveys to appear innocent, I must admit that I am slightly suspicious of you. Anyways that matters not as I have little power in this village, a fact that has me much disheartened.

--------------------------------------------
I see that Aganzir has posted while I was writting.

I actually thought that we had moved beyond this subject, but if you insist. . .

[/FONT]

Originally Posted by Aganzir

Well if you were wondering whether to trust more a person who made really good big cases against people or one who popped in to say "X looks weird... I'll tell more later," which one would you choose? If by saying a threat to the wolves you mean a player who's good at spotting wolves, it's difficult to make a difference between them, but if you mean one who can more easily convince others to think the way s/he does, I think it's justified to call Nog a greater threat than Cab.

I don't know what you mean by a "good" case, but of course if one never says anything else than "this person is suspicous" then you are little threat. I just want to point out that we where on day 1, there was plenty of time for McCabber to come good and on day 1 extensive cases are clearly overkill and seldom better than a gut feeling.

You are not a threat to the wolves if you convince people about your case and you are wrong. . .and now we have returned to an earlier stage of this discusion: Are more experienced players better at catching wolves.