![]() |
|
|
|
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
|
|
|
#1 | ||
|
Newly Deceased
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 2
![]() |
Morwen
Quote:
Formendacil Quote:
. When I learned English I had heard that phrase with "will(wilt) you" is not so polites as the phrase with "would you" and is a demand not an appeal. I am sorry I have used a wrong word in my first message.
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Auspicious Wraith
Join Date: May 2002
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 4,859
![]() ![]() |
I'd say ''will you'' and ''would you'' are equivalent, neither more demanding than the other. But I just queried my significant other, English being her second language, and the first thing she said was that ''would you'' is more polite.
Tolkien would have been aware of the proper distinction, although I'm afraid I must here pass the torch to someone who knows these words better. Wouldst thou, wilt thou... Perhaps Fordim will show up to help.
__________________
Los Ingobernables de Harlond |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Blithe Spirit
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,779
![]() ![]() |
What is also interesting is the use of "thou" rather than "you".
I think it is more intimate, showing a close relationship between Manwe and Feanor. And yes, would is definitely more polite, in that it implies I think more cajoling from the asker.
__________________
Out went the candle, and we were left darkling |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Back on the Helcaraxe
Posts: 733
![]() ![]() |
I went and checked out what I seemed to recall about "thee" or "thou" versus "you," and found that my memory wasn't shot. Originally, "thee" was considered a more intimate form of the word, and "you" more formal. Using "thee" in speaking to Feanor would have indicated the wish for a more personal and less formal interaction. The difference between "would" and "will" is more subtle. In this case, they are both being used in a request, but "would" implies a conditional situation (as in "I would if I could"). "Will" does not necessarily mean the question is a command, but it does not have the conditional implications of "would"; it is more straightforward ("will you or won't you"). "Will" could indicate a command, as in "you WILL do this," but Tulkas does use it in a question. I think the difference is that Manwe, because of his nature, is making a gentler (if fervent) request of Feanor; Tulkas, because of HIS nature, is pressing the issue, attempting to get a straight yes or no from Feanor. If that is the case, then their uses of would/wouldst and will/wilt (the latter being simply more archaic forms of the same word) are appropriate. Manwe is being polite. Tulkas is being a bit pushier.
And I would try to translate this, if I remembered more than a few words and phrases of Russian (studied it too long ago, alas ).
__________________
Call me Ibrin (or Ibri) :) Originality is the one thing that unoriginal minds cannot feel the use of. John Stewart Mill |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Pile O'Bones
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 15
![]() |
I think manwe just wants an answer. of course he is eager to have these silmarils ( at least one of them ) for he wants the trees to be healed. but if I think right about manwe, I think that he isn't someone to command a lesser person to give up something he wants to keep. tulkas is a bit less "smart" and tries to solve the problem by solving the question for feanor...
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|