![]() |
![]() |
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Pilgrim Soul
Join Date: May 2004
Location: watching the wonga-wonga birds circle...
Posts: 9,460
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I have to admit that it is one of those things that are nice symbolically but are completely impracticable and unlikely. Don't faint everyone but I think that this is one of the things the film were right to change (and you don't catch me saying that very often).
![]() A longsword is not the most practical weapon for someone travelling stealthily on foot and to lug a broken one is a bit stupid no matter how great teh sentimental value. Much more sensible to leave it in safety and carry a short bow and a short or at least functional sword. Aragorn (like anyone who ventures into the country for more than a gentle stroll)would have certainly carried a knife suitable for cleaning fish, skinning rabbits etc - even Sam does this and he is far less of a traveller. There was a time when carrying a knife was a day to day practicality. I certainly take a small swiss army type thing when I travel - never know when you might have to open a can, or remove a stone from a dragon's foot....
__________________
But Finrod walks with Finarfin his father beneath the trees in Eldamar.
Christopher Tolkien, Requiescat in pace |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Sage & Onions
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Britain
Posts: 894
![]() |
![]()
When Aragorn is first described he is meeting the Hobbits in the Prancing Pony. Possibly he had already rented a room and left his 'conventional' weapons and other gear in there? I guess he would have kept Anduril on his person just in case someone tried to nick it or he had to make a swift exit, after all even broken it was still irreplaceable.
On the Nazgul encounters he seemed to know that the fire-brands were more effective than ordinary swords. But this doesn't prove anything one way or the other! I'm sure everyone carried a knife in LoTR, essential for travelling, though don't try and get one onto an airliner!
__________________
Rumil of Coedhirion |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
shadow of a doubt
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Back on the streets
Posts: 1,125
![]() ![]() |
I will have to agree with this. The whole idea of Aragorn going out in the wilderness to protect Frodo and the ring completely unarmed would be bewildering for a movie audience. Yet, having Aragorn fight the Nazgul in an action-hero scene was a deviation from the original narrative I can not accept. This scene should have been made in horror-style. There should have been unseen and paralyzing terror, shilling to the very bone, not just a straight-forward attack by robed skeletons with swords.
__________________
"You can always come back, but you can't come back all the way" ~ Bob Dylan |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |