![]() |
|
|
|
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
|
#3 | |
|
Flame of the Ainulindalė
|
I'm afraid the way you pose the question creates more problems it helps us to solve... (althought that's also the way all the good questions end up doing.
)But I can't see a problem between Tolkien's quasi-mythology and actual mythologies in contrast to the world and how it "really" is. Quote:
So maybe we could just say that Tolkien's mythology - like all mythologies - have their particular view of this world we live in embedded with diffent kinds of beliefs and explanations to different things occuring, to how one should lead one's life and so on. An interesting spin off from this question surely is whether we can compare mythical worldviews to our more or less scientific contemporary view of things with the clear-cut division into natural and (non-existant) supernatural things. Or in which way the people long time ago perceived the notion of truth or explaining things. I mean we have some interesting remnants in our contemporary thought and speech of some different ways of perceiving things to be true or right. Like when you say your dearest mate is "a true friend". Or when after seeing Amelié you say that "it was so true", or "it was so right" (as Amelié finally gets the man). The poetic truth that is: how the world should be as to fulfill the norm of beauty-goodness-truth -thing (kalos) which in the end is the absolute "truth".
__________________
Upon the hearth the fire is red Beneath the roof there is a bed; But not yet weary are our feet... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|