WW XXXIII - Other Minds and Hands

[Anguirel]

Gil, "focus on Ang and Diamond" is a ridiculous statement that only a wolf would make. Our votes are retractable - once - and we still have considerable leeway. You are attempting to limit our choices. To me, that screams out your guilt.

Now, the obvious question - did Aganzir know anything at her death? Look over her remarks. It looks a bit like she cleared me, hadn't dreamt of Kath and was preparing to dream of Shasta.

Also, let's think about the wolf rationale here. Did they doubt Aganzir's Hunter claim, in which case Shasta might still be guilty? Was Shasta innocent, allowing them to attack in the expectation of two dead innocents and victory? Did they disbelieve Aganzir's claim and know she'd got it wrong about Shasta?

Why slip into instinct voting now (particularly Gil, who hasn't even any excuse?) This day is crucially important and we need to start reasoning. Look at the dead wolves and their relationships with the suspects...

I trust Diamond, am unsure about Shasta, think Kath looks opportunistic and Gil guilty as sin.

I have failed to convince many of you of my own good intentions; but I think the medium might have cleared me, and I can also remind you that, at the time the wolf Macalaure was claiming to be a Seer and trying to win votes, he said I was innocent. Obviously this could be a nod to me as a fellow-wolf, but that would be a quite risky course of action...