![]() |
![]() |
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Wight
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: twirling contentedly in a flower-filled field
Posts: 134
![]() |
![]() Quote:
*So* (my God, she has a point), an entirely *good* person is someone who knows (acknowledges) what is good and what is evil behavior, and either does all good or does as much as he or she can that can be qualified as *good* and as little as he or she can that can be qualified as *evil*. Another problem presents itself... how likely is this person (we'll go with your Bob) to do *all* good? How likely is he to, when really pressed, to cast aside his own health and feelings for the "greater good," even when he doesn't "feel like it"? To tie it to LOTR... Frodo. He steadfastly continues on his trip to Mt. Doom and his quest as the Ringbearer regardless of the danger to himself and those that he cares about. It was a different thing when he was safe in Rivendell, and filled with the words of the great, telling him how he, and only he, could accomplish this quest. A far different thing when he was in the depths of Mordor, glaring down the Eye, and under extreme physical and psychological strain from the journey and the power of the Ring. Still, he percerviered, and that is what makes him good. But not fully good. At the end he put on the Ring, and tried to face down the Dark Lord. At the end he gave in. Is he still good? Yes. He was more "good" than "bad." But a fully "good" person would not have given in. Till next time (my dad wants the computer now... [img]smilies/rolleyes.gif[/img] ) -'Vana
__________________
"There is a kind of happiness and wonder that makes you serious. It is too good to waste on jokes." Hi! Did you miss me? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |