![]() |
|
|
|
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Shadowed Prince
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Thulcandra
Posts: 2,343
![]() |
Well, I'm here now.
I'll just say my general feelings, having read over the thread, before I go on to proper analysis of yesterday's going-ons and try to draw conclusions from them. I am still suspicious of Lommy, and especially don't like the way she's voted for me again. More on that later. I'm also very wary of Roa, who has built a case against Nogrod out of air (or waffles). I think these two are likely to be a lupine pair. Finally: Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |||||
|
Shadowed Prince
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Thulcandra
Posts: 2,343
![]() |
Edit: From above, I didn't mean "again." Lommy has only voted for me once so far, of course.
Lommy She's just voted for me for voting for her with an "ill constructed" case. Retaliation is not in the village's interests, and I feel my case to be both justified and reinforced by her behaviour today. Firstly, in her first post, she supports Roa's post about the gifteds. Rikae (sensibly, in my opinion) picks holes in Roa's argument, but Lommy thinks she's innocent too, merely misunderstanding. She attacks Glirdan for supporting Rikae's "feeblish accusations" - feeble-ish? It's a sound accusation. Roa advocates mistrust of any person revealing themselves as gifted; how is that possibly good? She then votes for Glirdan. To me, with hindsight, this looks very much like a wolf-on-wolf vote. Lommy says her evidence is feeble, so she can distance herself from it in the future, but she still manages to vote for a fellow wolf. Saying her evidence is feeble also decreases the potential of the vote becoming a bandwagon. In response to Lommy's post today: Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
![]() I'm also wary of the Lommy-fanclub that seems to be springing up, and think it's at least partly wolf-influenced. |
|||||
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|