Admin thread to WW XXX - Tol-in-Elendili - The Isle of the Were-Faithfuls - The Barrow-Downs Discussion Forum

Lalaith · 03-12-2007, 02:52 PM

OMG. I can't believe it...you didn't even think Lommy was the Hunter anyway so all my careful deductions that Saturday were a COMPLETE WASTE OF TIME....it was a really nice day, I could have been out in the sunshine and everything....
*throws another childish tantrum*

Lommy, I thought you must be innocent because you kept saying things I'd been thinking. Which tends to be a good sign, in my experience.
And I thought Gil was innocent because of the Glirdan thing, a wolfish nighttime discussion would have cleared up his confusion and clearly he hadn't been party to any such discussion.
And then, when Gil turned out to be the Ranger, I realised you must be the Hunter. Because we were the only two to defend him.

**The Saucepan Man** · 03-12-2007, 05:08 PM

Many thanks for posting that Durelin. Legate's compelling analyses and dedutions were another Night-time highlight for me, so it's great to see that he continued analysing and deducing right up to the end.

Your choice of Kath was quite unexpected to me, even though we had discussed her previously, so it's good to see the reasoning. I thought that was probably what led you to kill her.

My own view (from the grave) was that Lommy was the best choice for Night 7. I thought that there was a 50:50 chance of her being the Hunter (on the basis that only she and Lal did not vote for Gil), but I had thought that Lal had defended him more throughout the game. It didn't occur to me that a Huntress Mith might have put in the last minute vote for Gil to avoid detection, but (even though it was not the case) it was solid reasoning. Still, even though I thought that there was a significant risk that Lommy would take one of you with her, she looked the best bet because she had in effect become an all-but-known innocent. I also thought that, even if she took one of you with her (and I thought Durelin the most likely), the other would still be in with a good chance, albeit that this would involve seeing through another Day.

Anyway, interesting stuff, so thanks.

Oh and Noggie, I would have been rambling on about always seeming to vote for the Seer whether I had been innocent or guilty because ... well ... I always do. I even managed to vote for her in this game without actually intending to ...

Lalaith · 03-12-2007, 09:58 PM

Oh and btw, Lommy, if I *had* guessed you and Gil were the H&R, there's no way I would have drawn attention to it by grouping you together as innocents like that! Sorry, it must have been rather worrying for you both...

Thinlómien · 03-13-2007, 01:55 AM

Those PMs are so funny!

Thanks for sharing.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lalaith

Oh and btw, Lommy, if I *had* guessed you and Gil were the H&R, there's no way I would have drawn attention to it by grouping you together as innocents like that! Sorry, it must have been rather worrying for you both...

It actually wasn't, since almost no one was heeding what you were saying...

And I thought that if you were a wolf, you wouldn't have said that, but killed us in the night and thus I thought you were innocent...

Legate of Amon Lanc · 03-13-2007, 05:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Durelin

Legate should post the entirety of his VERY LONG hunter pondering PM. It was just amazing. The amount of work and thought he put into that...insane. I wasn't sure if you'd want it all shared, though, Legate, so I've only shared small (very small by comparison) pieces.

I think for illustration, it suffices. Who would want to read it, anyway

And I think you chose good parts, it maps the main thoughts.

And yes... insane is quite precise word for that.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thinlómien

Those PMs are so funny! Thanks for sharing.

I think that was the funniest part of it. And the last night was perhaps the funniest for me. You can probably guess from what you read

Rikae · 03-13-2007, 07:02 PM

OK, I just got back from my trip, and thought I ought to apologise to my fellow villagers for being so suspicious early on. It occured to me, too, after I revealed myself, that I could have saved my neck simply by switching my own vote.

It's a learning experience, I guess...I'll do better next time I'm gifted, I promise.

Nice job, faithfuls.

03-12-2007, 02:52 PM	#1
Lalaith Blithe Spirit Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 2,779	OMG. I can't believe it...you didn't even think Lommy was the Hunter anyway so all my careful deductions that Saturday were a COMPLETE WASTE OF TIME....it was a really nice day, I could have been out in the sunshine and everything.... throws another childish tantrum Lommy, I thought you must be innocent because you kept saying things I'd been thinking. Which tends to be a good sign, in my experience. And I thought Gil was innocent because of the Glirdan thing, a wolfish nighttime discussion would have cleared up his confusion and clearly he hadn't been party to any such discussion. And then, when Gil turned out to be the Ranger, I realised you must be the Hunter. Because we were the only two to defend him. __________________ Out went the candle, and we were left darkling

03-12-2007, 05:08 PM	#2
The Saucepan Man Corpus Cacophonous Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: A green and pleasant land Posts: 8,390	Many thanks for posting that Durelin. Legate's compelling analyses and dedutions were another Night-time highlight for me, so it's great to see that he continued analysing and deducing right up to the end. Your choice of Kath was quite unexpected to me, even though we had discussed her previously, so it's good to see the reasoning. I thought that was probably what led you to kill her. My own view (from the grave) was that Lommy was the best choice for Night 7. I thought that there was a 50:50 chance of her being the Hunter (on the basis that only she and Lal did not vote for Gil), but I had thought that Lal had defended him more throughout the game. It didn't occur to me that a Huntress Mith might have put in the last minute vote for Gil to avoid detection, but (even though it was not the case) it was solid reasoning. Still, even though I thought that there was a significant risk that Lommy would take one of you with her, she looked the best bet because she had in effect become an all-but-known innocent. I also thought that, even if she took one of you with her (and I thought Durelin the most likely), the other would still be in with a good chance, albeit that this would involve seeing through another Day. Anyway, interesting stuff, so thanks. Oh and Noggie, I would have been rambling on about always seeming to vote for the Seer whether I had been innocent or guilty because ... well ... I always do. I even managed to vote for her in this game without actually intending to ... __________________ Do you mind? I'm busy doing the fishstick. It's a very delicate state of mind!

03-12-2007, 09:58 PM	#3
Lalaith Blithe Spirit Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 2,779	Oh and btw, Lommy, if I had guessed you and Gil were the H&R, there's no way I would have drawn attention to it by grouping you together as innocents like that! Sorry, it must have been rather worrying for you both... __________________ Out went the candle, and we were left darkling

03-13-2007, 07:02 PM	#6
Rikae Mellifluous Maia Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: A glade open to the stars, deep in Nan Elmoth Posts: 3,489	OK, I just got back from my trip, and thought I ought to apologise to my fellow villagers for being so suspicious early on. It occured to me, too, after I revealed myself, that I could have saved my neck simply by switching my own vote. It's a learning experience, I guess...I'll do better next time I'm gifted, I promise. Nice job, faithfuls.