![]() |
![]() |
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Estelo dagnir, Melo ring
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,063
![]() ![]() |
Perhaps, depending on what they wished to accomplish, Maiar might be forced to fall into the natural laws of Ea?
Such as, if the Istari wished to have the magical abilities they had to apply to the nature of Ea (and perhaps on a cosmic sort of level, they had to stick their 'souls' so to speak into the cosmic web of Ea and the fate of Middle-earth in particular in order to help the land and its peoples), and so had to take on bodies that were in line with the physics and natural order of things. Or, their more 'ultimate' power was something the Maiar gave up in order to show the depth of their commitment to Middle-earth, and once it was given up, it could not be gotten back without first completing their mission. Maybe for Radagast, any 'shape-shifting' he did was still simply bound by the laws of nature, and so he could only don the visage of anything natural in Middle-earth. And even then I expect he was limited in this power (his 'old age' meant he could not exert himself too much would be the simplest of limits). I think Raynor's point that his way with 'illusion' was applied to the world around him rather than to himself is interesting, though. Is it 'illusion,' though, that Radagast was the master of, or actually some form of 'shape-shifting?' Even if he could change his own appearance, was it simply an illusion, or did he actually take on the form of, say, an animal? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | ||||
Spirit of the Lonely Star
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 5,133
![]() |
Interesting topic Sardy! And good points Raynor. But regarding Aiwendil, I would argue that he did retain mastery of shapes and hues, even as an istari.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Yes, I know we can rationalize Beorn's abilities and make him a beserker in a bear skin rather than a true bear, but I do not think this is what Tolkien intended. Certain characters in his Legendarium still have one foot in faerie. The critical point here is the way we interpret the race of men. Perhaps the "Man" of Middle-earth could exhibit somewhat different characteristics than those we now regard as typical for modern man. Not only do we have the example of a shape-shifting man in The Hobbit but just look at how long the men of Numenor lived. Their lifespan far exceeded that of any "normal" human. It is very true that the istari had to take on human form, which meant they were subject to hunger, weariness, and even death. But at the same time I don't think we can automatically assume that our own ideas about what a man is and isn't were exactly those that Tolkien held. Note also the wording of this text in UT that pertains to the istari : Quote:
When Gandalf died and was remade, how much of this was a physical remaking and how much was simply taking off the restrictions that had bound him up till that point? There may have been a little of both involved, but wasn't the removal of the restrictions really the most important of the two?
__________________
Multitasking women are never too busy to vote. Last edited by Child of the 7th Age; 10-26-2006 at 11:32 PM. |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |||
Shade of Carn Dûm
|
![]()
Originally posted by Child of the 7th Age
Quote:
To put it another way I have understood Radagast’s mastery of ‘shapes and hues’ as evidence for both. He was able to ‘shift’ had there been no ban upon him. Thus the only power we see him exert in a manner of ‘shapes and hues’ is the manipulation of the environment around him, a self imposed restriction if you will. Quote:
“For Radagast, the fourth, became enamoured of the many beasts and birds that dwelt in Middle-earth, and forsook Elves and Men, and spent his days among the wild creatures.” (Unfinished Tales, The Istari) His interaction with men was little, therefore he was able to ‘shift’ out of sight of men, thus not revealing himself in different forms, and so not technically breaking the ban imposed on them by Manwë.
__________________
"I am, I fear, a most unsatisfactory person."
- (Letter #124 To Sir Stanley Unwin) |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |