The Barrow-Downs Discussion Forum


Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page

Go Back   The Barrow-Downs Discussion Forum > Middle-Earth Discussions > Novices and Newcomers
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 05-07-2003, 12:27 PM   #11
DaughterofVana
Wight
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: twirling contentedly in a flower-filled field
Posts: 134
DaughterofVana has just left Hobbiton.
Sting

Quote:
But taking the topic swiftly back to Tolkien - ME was of course called into existence by a monotheistic being, in proper creationist fashion. This may, or may not, endear him to fundamentalists, I don't know.
It would, IF they would bother reading the books in the first place. Along the lines of what Iarwain talked about before, typecasting is a common strategy of people who *know* something is wrong, can't really figure out why, and so they therefore stick it in a little box and write BAD! in really big letters. Knowledge is one of the key combatants of fear. That's why, before a person picks a stance on *anything* (religion, politics, etc.) he or she should find out as much as he or she can about the opposing viewpoints. So much better, then, to combat the chosen viewpoint against the other ones.

Quote:
Why, by the way, Sophia, would the films have resulted in the banning of the books when they weren't banned before?
(I know I'm not Sophia, btw) The movies could have one of two affects on the "fundie's" viewpoint on LOTR:

1. They could finally see the Christian *themes* (not symbolism!) in the movie's version of the written work and perhaps give it a second chance by actually *reading* it this time

or

2. Say that the themes are all well and good, but all that magic and wizards and orcs and stuff *still* isn't good for the kiddies. The "bad" outnumbers the "good."

Viewpoint #2, obviously, could be countered by actually *reading* LOTR... but if they still think that way, well, then there's no helping them. Once they read the book and gave it a fair shot, then they are intitled to their opinions. I doubt very seriously that someone who has given LOTR a fair shot would see that it is not the "magic and deamon-filled book" as they make it out to be.

EDIT: also, Eru and his Valar really had no part in the LOTR, outside of the elves mentioning Varda. Outside of the knowledge that we have of the Sil, Varda could have been the Mother Goddess. Who knows how she and the others appear to the ignorant.

-'Vana

[ May 07, 2003: Message edited by: DaughterofVana ]
__________________
"There is a kind of happiness and wonder that makes you serious. It is too good to waste on jokes."

Hi! Did you miss me?
DaughterofVana is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:23 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.