![]() |
![]() |
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
![]() |
#14 | |
Byronic Brand
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: The 1590s
Posts: 2,778
![]() |
LMP and morm, you've both raised questions that I just can't resist wading into. You see, I'm at heart (well, one of them) a medieval historian. Inheritance, suzerainty, appanages, fiefs, septs, feuds, royal authority...these things make me excited.
Ahem. LMP first. Quote:
So, as you say, sons (first and second) are probably more likely to resort to ambitious adventuring. This immortality of Elves might have, therefore, increased their drive to acquire temporal wealth. We do actually see a lot of Elves founding realms-in the Silmarillion. In Valinor, the royal families are cooped up under their unquestioned heads, drifting from Valarin hall to Valarin hall. The Rebellion of the Noldor must have released a lot of supressed creative and acquisitive energy. We can see this in the magnificent dreams and thirst for power of Galadriel, for instance. Once in Beleriand, the situation is rather different (quite remniscent of the Crusader States) in that even the Kings are in daily danger of death. Inheritance becomes a frequent occurence in need of control under a system. It seems from, say, the mostly orderly transitions of the High Kingship, that the Elves early settled that that system should be basically primogeniture-following Feanor's own precedent, I suppose. Imagine what might have happened without such an inheritance system with such Anguirel-Idols as Celegorm, Curufin and Maeglin running about! Yet still there are so many cadet royals that many kingdoms like Nargothrond or Thargelion are founded by younger siblings and their descendants. Even in the Third Age we see an example of such a pioneering elven realm-Legolas' land in Ithilien, because despite being "Prince of Mirkwood" (allow me to spit on that absurd phrase) he wasn't likely to inherit it anytime soon... Now, morm. You wonder about actual power possessed by Elvenkings. I say it depends on the circumstances, time, and even the personality of the ruler involved. Let's take those alpha-Elvenkings-Finwe, Ingwe, Elwe, Olwe. I imagine these as sort of ancestor-gods roled into chieftains. They exemplify the characteristics of the people they govern. It's not so much that Finwe rules the Noldor, as that he is the Noldor, and in my view the reason the High Kingship in Middle-Earth foundered is that by the Third Age there was no one who could...act as a symbol of the entire Noldorin race. Before arriving in Valinor, these Kings would, I think, have had a great deal of power and responsibility in practical terms; as protectors, guardians, certainly shepherds, fathers of their people, and war-leaders when needed too. Their role in Valinor would be more ceremonial and diplomatic, with perhaps little need for authoritarian decisions, acting as mediators with the Valar. Returning to Beleriand, by the First Age things would be a lot more variable, but probably generally the Kings would be-and would need to be-extremely powerful. They after all kept large enough armies in the field to keep Morgoth locked in for some time. That needs unquestioned obedience. While Thingol, safe in Melian's Girdle, wouldn't need such centralised power, I'm pretty sure he'd demand it anyway, as the most venerable Elven ruler left. There are exceptions to this. If you ask me Finrod and Orodreth would both have ruled Nargothrond with the consent and counsel of a large aristocracy-an aristocracy who were to reject Finrod and keep Orodreth generally sedate. (They're loyal to the House of Finarfin though-Celegorm can't usurp Nargothrond directly, it seems.) Elwing's rule over the Havens probably needed the advice of her nobles. But generally, I don't hold with this "Elves are proto-democrats/anarchist-syndicalists/fully paid up members of the Green Party" stuff. They were in a feudal situation and would have needed feudal government of one kind or another. Into the Third Age, Thranduil of the Hobbit is very much an absolute faery-king, able to march to war on a whim if he chooses, riding at the head of his hunt. Galadriel and Celeborn's rule of Lothlorien, Elrond's rule of Imladris and Cirdan's of Mithlond are all different cases, however. Galadriel rules as "Lady", and she and Celeborn are stewards of a realm without its true king, drowned Amroth. Elrond and Cirdan both rule the remnants of the High Kingship in Lindon. Elrond has some royal blood, but rules, it seems to me, primus inter pares, in a quite collegiate way almost. He is Master, and I can really see him Master of Rivendell College Cambridge! (I get the feeling he's Cambridge. Don't know why exactly.) Cirdan is vaguely noble but is really there because no one else with a real claim is, well, left. Notice that these positions seem to be quite interchangeable; Celeborn, without any hereditary claim, succeeds Elrond at Rivendell. Perhaps the Elves came late to tanistry here!
__________________
Among the friendly dead, being bad at games did not seem to matter -Il Lupo Fenriso |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |