Tol-in-Gaurhoth XXII: Hic Monstrae Trucidant

[Thinlómien]

(= conclusions on morm)

His Day1, which I regarded as suspicious doesn't make mee feel suspicious of him anymore. He seems just like a normal villager in a hurry.

His Day2 is a bit more worriesome. He doesn't give any reasons to his suspicions. As said before, it might be an answer-provoking strategy, but I still don't like it. It'd be a perfect cover for a wolf. And, suspicion of all those persons he mentioned had been expressed before. So the answer-provoking was in vain. Furthermore, those people were generally suspected so he even didn't bring new cases out.

His Day3 is not much better. More about the post #268 above. I don't like his analysis of me either. What kind of accusation is:

gives a weak reason for voting for Boromir

Are there non-weak reasonings on Day1s?

Final conclusion: I continue to be wary of him. He's my top suspect.

An add: I have been careless:

Originally Posted by me, bolding not in the post

#275 - Analyses Thinlómien. Accuses her of twisting SPM's words, not understanding him, giving weak reasoning on Boromir-vote, voting morm because of playing style and "taking path of least resistance".

It should read "not wanting to understand him".