Tol-in-Gaurhoth XX: Wereorc I: The elves cannot hide themselves much longer. - The Barrow-Downs Discussion Forum

Celuien · 04-14-2006, 08:22 PM

The promised view of Naria:

Day 1:
#25: In character stuff, laments Farael, vows to aid the village against the orcs. Agrees about discretion for dreams. Doesn’t have any suspicions at the moment.
#35: Says orcs will pick off identified innocents one by one if revealed. Agrees that the topic should be dropped temporarily in favor of looking for orcs. Points out that Roa’s second quote attributed to her wasn’t hers. Notes her computer will be gone soon.

Does not return for vote.

Not much to go on (again) from day 1. Winds up just agreeing with everyone else. Can’t go one way or the other on suspicion of her.

Day 2:
#110: Celebrates Ranger’s good job. Apologizes for missing vote due to computer issues. (Believable and consistent with #35.) Still doesn’t suspect anyone.
#114: Finds Diamond’s posts conflicting with themselves regarding the helpfulness of analysis. Thinks Diamond may be trying to look helpful while not really helping.

And that’s it so far. Pending further developments, I don’t know what to think of her. But this situation seems fairly usual. There’s nothing overtly suspicious about her. I’ll add her to my watch list just because I don’t have much to go on yet. And I want something to go on.

See you in a few hours.

04-14-2006, 08:22 PM	#11
Celuien Riveting Ribbiter Join Date: May 2005 Location: Assigned to Mordor Posts: 1,767	The promised view of Naria: Day 1: #25: In character stuff, laments Farael, vows to aid the village against the orcs. Agrees about discretion for dreams. Doesn’t have any suspicions at the moment. #35: Says orcs will pick off identified innocents one by one if revealed. Agrees that the topic should be dropped temporarily in favor of looking for orcs. Points out that Roa’s second quote attributed to her wasn’t hers. Notes her computer will be gone soon. Does not return for vote. Not much to go on (again) from day 1. Winds up just agreeing with everyone else. Can’t go one way or the other on suspicion of her. Day 2: #110: Celebrates Ranger’s good job. Apologizes for missing vote due to computer issues. (Believable and consistent with #35.) Still doesn’t suspect anyone. #114: Finds Diamond’s posts conflicting with themselves regarding the helpfulness of analysis. Thinks Diamond may be trying to look helpful while not really helping. And that’s it so far. Pending further developments, I don’t know what to think of her. But this situation seems fairly usual. There’s nothing overtly suspicious about her. I’ll add her to my watch list just because I don’t have much to go on yet. And I want something to go on. See you in a few hours. __________________ People assume that time is a strict progression of cause to effect. But actually, from a non-linear, non-subjective viewpoint, it's more like a big ball of wibbly-wobbly, timey-wimey... stuff.