![]() |
|
|
|
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
|
#11 | ||||
|
Hauntress of the Havens
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: IN it, but not OF it
Posts: 2,538
![]() |
Probably more sensible thoughts...but still not too much so.
1. Anguirel pointed out a possible (uber-subtle) hint that Holby made with regards to her Seership, and admits that it's very easy to pass over it. Could be an attempt to get to our - the innocents' - side, but could also be a bluff. Trying to be helpful while gloating that "Hehe, we found your Seer. Nyahnyahnyah." I'm sure mormegil's familiar with this theory, aren't you, morm? Wasn't at all accurate the first time it was used, but who said it can't be used again? 2. Speaking of morm...(here we go again)...I find his vote for Gil yesterDay a bit unsettling. A safe vote, yes. And we think, "Whoever said an experienced player like morm can't make a safe vote?" Woosh! and away he goes from the suspect list. 3. Oh. I guess I have to answer Glirdan, right? Hey, a princess like me can be forgetful at times. So, looky here, Glirdy! Quote:
Besides, is your timezones as grave and crippling as mine? Nyahnyah. Quote:
Quote:
![]() Besides, it was more the odds I was referring to regarding your innocence, not your behavior. Quote:
4. Suspects: Elem/doubleyoupi, Anguirel, Kath, Celuien, tar-ancalime Sigh. I'm still quite at a loss and it's time for me to go. I wanted to give you the benefit of the doubt even for just a Day - plus I know what the Mordor you just went through - but your name attracts the plus signs as Celuien's long sticky tongue attracts flies.++LITTLEMANPOET P. S. tar-ancalime, I've utilized my own pair of sandals in this post, so I'll no longer suspect you for using yours. However, you remain suspicious for that Eomer vote. Like Nilp said, it could be a wolf-on-wolf vote. On the other hand, it could be a safe random vote. It just doesn't sit right with me, now that I've thought about it. |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|