frodo was both the weakest and strongest person in the Trilogy? - The Barrow-Downs Discussion Forum

Gimli Son Of Gloin · 05-11-2002, 01:52 PM

Frodo and Sam are simbionts(is that how you spell it?). Neither one of them could have succeeded without the other. I don't think Sam could have carried the Ring all the way without him claiming it for himself a lot sooner. Frodo needed Sam, for phyisical and mental reasons. Without Sam he couldn't have escapes from from Cirith Ungol, and without Sam he wouldn't have had the encouragment to go on.

05-11-2002, 01:52 PM	#14
Gimli Son Of Gloin Shade of Carn Dûm Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: The Halls of Montezuma, and the Shores of Tripoli Posts: 495	Frodo and Sam are simbionts(is that how you spell it?). Neither one of them could have succeeded without the other. I don't think Sam could have carried the Ring all the way without him claiming it for himself a lot sooner. Frodo needed Sam, for phyisical and mental reasons. Without Sam he couldn't have escapes from from Cirith Ungol, and without Sam he wouldn't have had the encouragment to go on. __________________ The Few, the Proud, the Marines.