how can a man use the one ring?

[Farael]

Feanor,

In my humble opinion, Bilbo Baggins did not get any 'gifts' from the ring other than unusually long life because his heart did not desire it. He was a simple man (or hobbit rather) and he was not concerned with glory or fame.

I believe that the powers of "perverting" the bearer's soul asociated with the ring were related to the "unconscious desires" of the bearer rather than what they consciously wanted. When Frodo offers the ring to Galadriel, she says that with it she would become a powerful queen, so terribly beautiful that everyone would stand in awe of her. I think this is in a way a hidden desire of hers. Instant gratification in contrast with hard work. She is able to reject the tempation of instant gratification (the ring) and therefore she shows a lot of strenght of character, yet Frodo had no such desires and therefore he was given no such gifts.

I hope that was clear, let me know if it was not =)

[Boromir88]

when isuldur cut the One Ring from the hand of Sauron after the war of the Last Alliance he din't want to destroy the ring because
he thought that they would be more powerfull with the ring and he could use the power of the ring against the dark powers of the middle earth.

Actually, Isildur didn't want to use the Ring. Tolkien took this belief from history called "weregild" this concept is often missed. And the statement Elrond gives us in The Council of Elrond, as to what Isildur proclaimed:

'This I will have as weregild for my father, and my brother'

Weregild is an idea that originates in Arabia and Scandanavia. Basically, it says that as a matter of family honor, the murderer of your family member(s) had to pay "weregild." In this case Sauron had killed Elendil, and Anarion (though he was killed by a rock from Barad-dur) and Isildur took the Ring as Sauron's "weregild."

In German and Old English "weregild" was established by someone's rank. So, someone as high ranking as Elendil, Isildur would be able to take something of extreme value from Sauron's. And Sauron's most precious possession was the Ring.

Anyway, Isildur had taken the Ring and claimed that since Sauron murdered his father and brother, the ring will serve as a "weregild," for his actions. Which again goes way back in history.

So, with that cleared up, onto the actual question I guess. I don't think it's out of the question that a human (such as Aragorn) could have use the Ring to have armies flock to his banner and defeat Sauron. This was Boromir's aspirations, but whether it was the Ring filling his head with ludicrous ideas or not, who knows:

"What could not a warrior do in this hour, a great leader? What could not Aragorn do? Or if he refuses, why not Boromir? The Ring would give me power of Command. How I would drive the hosts of Mordor, and all men would flock to my banner!"~Boromir: The Breaking of the Fellowship

So, I think a human could use the ring to summon a big enough army to his "side" to drive off Mordor and defeat Sauron. However, as Tolkien tells us in Letter 246, no mortal (not even Aragorn) could hope of using the Ring against Sauron, one-on-one. And the only person who may be expected to do so successfully would be Gandalf.

We also know that Galadriel and Elrond desired the Ring to gather an army to their banner and overthrow Sauron (though they were able to resist). So, I think this could be the same case if a mortal decides to take the Ring.

[The Squatter of Amon Rûdh]

To clarify what Boromir88 has just said, weregild is Old English, and literally means 'man-payment' or 'man-price'. It is a form of compensation for death or injury, the purpose of which in early Germanic societies was to avert socially destructive feuds by providing a means of satisfying family honour without resorting to physical revenge. The price for a slave's finger was relatively small, that for a nobleman's sword-arm probably more than the average person could earn in a decade; for the lives of a king and his son, payable to their son and brother, it could be expected to be astronomical.

For Tolkien, Isildur's description of the Ring as 'weregild' parallels Gollum's repeated description of it as a 'birthday present'. It is a self-justifying excuse, intended to put his claim to something that he wants beyond debate. Both are reasonable claims, but neither is honest, and this becomes clear when Isildur announces in his own hand that "It is precious to me...": the reader is intended to realise that the same processes are at work in him that can be observed in Gollum, and that Isildur's expressed reasons cannot be trusted.

The point is that whether or not Isildur could realistically use the Ring is irrelevant. He could no more bear to leave it on the battlefield or allow it to be destroyed than Sméagol could bear to let Déagol keep it. He wanted the Ring; whether or not it would be of any use to him did not signify.

[Farael]

Originally Posted by The Squatter of Amon Rûdh

The point is that whether or not Isildur could realistically use the Ring is irrelevant. He could no more bear to leave it on the battlefield or allow it to be destroyed than Sméagol could bear to let Déagol keep it. He wanted the Ring; whether or not it would be of any use to him did not signify.

I do think it is relevant as not only it IS the topic of this thread, but we also see Boromir wanting to use it therefore the question was "would he be able to do something with it besides just disapearing?"

Originally Posted by TheSaucepanMan

Don't forget also that the Nine Rings gave the Men who became the Nazgul great power, wealth and sorcery, while ultimately binding them to Sauron's will. If the Nine could do that, then the One could surely bestow even greater power.

And I have to agree with this.

But also we get

The ring had given him power according to his stature.

Therefore, I agree that

Originally Posted by Boromir88

I think a human could use the ring to summon a big enough army to his "side" to drive off Mordor and defeat Sauron. However, as Tolkien tells us in Letter 246, no mortal (not even Aragorn) could hope of using the Ring against Sauron, one-on-one. And the only person who may be expected to do so successfully would be Gandalf

The Ring is still giving them power according to their stature, yet it is also increasing this same 'stature'. I would believe that, should someone be able to hold on to the Ring, use it and avoid meeting Sauron head-on at once, they would become more powerful than Sauron himself (by gaining mastery of the Ring). But in order to gain mastery of the ring they would have to become so corrupted that they'd be just another Sauron.

[Kalimac]

Which raises the question of what exactly Gandalf was capable of becoming if he was the only one who could have used the Ring against Sauron. And if the example of Saruman is anything to go by, wizards could make themselves pretty terrifying even *without* the Ring...

[Boromir88]

The Ring is still giving them power according to their stature, yet it is also increasing this same 'stature'. I would believe that, should someone be able to hold on to the Ring, use it and avoid meeting Sauron head-on at once, they would become more powerful than Sauron himself (by gaining mastery of the Ring). But in order to gain mastery of the ring they would have to become so corrupted that they'd be just another Sauron.~Farael

The thing is it's not as easy as being able to hold on to the Ring for a long amount of time. It deals with breaking the bond between the Ring and Sauron and to do that you have to be extremely powerful...

While he wore it, his power on earth was actually enhanced. But even if he did not wear it, that power existed and was in 'rapport' with himself: he was not 'diminished'. Unless some other seized it and became possessed of it. If that happened, the new possessor could (if sufficiently strong and heroic by nature) challenge sauron, become master of all that he had learned or done since the making of the One Ring, and so overthrow him and usurp his place.~Letter 156

Saruman had attempted to do exactly as this says...become master of all that he had learned or done since the making of the One Ring, and so overthrow him and usurp his place...whether he would have been successful is up to debate. We know that Saruman was well learnt in the Rings of power, especially the One Ring. His plan was to buddy up to Sauron, be patient, wait for the perfect moment, and then turn on him, using the Ring against him (see Gandalf's account of Saruman in The Council of Elrond). Whether he would have been able to do it is up to debate. Personally, I believe Saruman was fooled by his own capabilities and his own power, and would have failed.

The Ring's powers and Sauron's powers were one. He had poured so much of his own power in it, the Ring was bound to him. In order to break the "bond" and diminish Sauron one had to do as it says in the quote above. And as we see from Letter 246, Tolkien thinks only Gandalf would be able to do so:

In any case a confrontation of Frodo and Sauron would soon have taken place, if the Ring was intact. Its result was inevitable. Frodo would have been utterly overthrown: crushed to dust, or preserved in torment as a gibbering slave. Sauron would not have feared the Ring! It was his own and under his will. Even from afar he had an effect upon it, to make it work for its return to himsefl. In his actual presence none but very few of equal stature could have hoped to withhold it from him. Of "mortals" no one, not even Aragorn. In the contest with the Palantir Aragorn was the rightful owner. Also the contest took place at a distance, and in a tale which allows the incarnation of great spirits in a physical and destructivle form their power must be far greater when actually physically present. Sauron should be thought of as very terrible. The form that he took was that of a man of more than human stature, but not gigantic. In his earlier incarnation he was able to veil his power (as Gandalf did) and could appear as a commanding figure of great strength of body and supremely royal demeanour and countenance.

Of the others only Gandalf might be expected to master him - being an emissary of the Powers and a creature of the same order, an immortal spirit taking a visible physical form. In the "Mirror of Galadriel", it appears that Galadriel conceived of herself as capable of wielding the Ring and supplanting the Dark Lord. IF so, so also were the other guardians of the Three, especially Elrond. But this is another matter. It was part of the essential deceit of the Ring to fill minds with imaginations of supreme power. But this the Great had well considered and had rejected, as is seen in Elrond's words at the Council. Galadriel's rejection of the temptation was founded upon previous thought and resolve. In any case Elrond or Galadriel would have proceeded in the policy now adopted by Sauron: they would have built up an empire with great and absolutely subservient generals and armies and engines of war, until they could challenge Sauron and destroy him by force. Confrontation of Sauron alone, unaided, self to self, was not contemplated.

So, here we see that any mortal who attempts to withold the Ring from Sauron, and master it, would not be able to do so. Gandalf is only the person that may possibly be able to master Sauron and the Ring.

[Elu Ancalime]

It may not have been mentioned much, but remember, tread the use of magic carefully. Magic in our world is easy to define, as some feat accomplished that is extraordinary and supernatural. In Tolkiens world, any of theswe 'magic' events may be normal to the protagonist. 'Powers' might be a better term. While fireworks to hobbits might be magic, fireworks to Sauron may be nothing more special than a sneeze. Jutst to piont that out. And btw, that is my own definition, i credit it from what i know.
________
DODGE VENOM