![]() |
|
|
|
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
|
#5 | |||||
|
Laconic Loreman
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
So one side said he did relinquish his throne, the other side says he didn't, obviously one is lying. Though I would think of all people the Council and Pelendur were the ones lying in the Silmarillion... Quote:
I do agree with Arvedui that Isildur did not mean for the two kingdoms to be divided, I actually think he probably was going to take up the High Kingship of his father. However, does he ever get to do this? As we know he's ambushed and killed. If not then the Council appears to have made the right decision in Arvedui's claim. We also must recognize the difference between Arvedui and Aragorn's claim. Arvedui claimed to be Isildur's heir, and the Council says, aint gonna work because Isildur gave up his reign here. Aragorn claims to be Elendil's heir, taking up the high kingship and reuniniting the two Kingdoms. Which, is I think the big difference between Aragorn's claim and Arvedui's claim. But, I have to wonder, along with Kuru, was it more of Aragorn's "claim," or the fact of his timely arrival on Pelennor, saving Gondor, and the political vaccuum in Gondor that caused him to get the crown? Quote:
__________________
Fenris Penguin
Last edited by Boromir88; 10-28-2005 at 10:29 AM. |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|