The Barrow-Downs Discussion Forum


Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page

Go Back   The Barrow-Downs Discussion Forum > Middle-Earth Discussions > The Books
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 09-09-2003, 08:51 PM   #3
Corwyn Celesil
Haunting Spirit
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: The House of the Fountain, Gondolin
Posts: 57
Corwyn Celesil has just left Hobbiton.
Pipe

I believe I have heard the same, that farther is the indicator of distance. I have just looked it up in a dictionary (Websters Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary), and it has a note that says this: "Farther and further have been used more or less interchangeably throughout most of their history, but currently they are showing signs of diverging. As adverbs they continue to be used interchangeably whenever spatial, temporal, or metaphysical distance is involved. But where there is no notion of distance, further is used. [. . .] a polarizing process appears to be taking place in their adjective use. Farther is taking over the meaning of distance . . . " Thus perhaps it is that in Tolkien's time, no such polarization or divergence had yet taken place. My question is: why, if they originally were used interchangeably, was there a need for two such similar words?
__________________
Then came there from the south of the city the people of the Fountain, and Ecthelion was their lord, and silver and diamonds were their delight; and swords very long and bright and pale did they wield . . .
Corwyn Celesil is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:15 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.