I hate not knowing things. My thoughts are currently ranging all over the place, but the most solid thing I can settle on is that I'm very suspicious of Sleepy Ranger and of Bergil.
Why Bergil:
Quote:
|
I was going to give Fea another chance, and she blew it by encouraging bandwaggoning, the very thing that will give the wolves annonimity. also, doesn't T.O.R.E. seem strangely analytical?
|
Is it that he truly doesn't get what I'm doing? Or is he feeling around for possible ways to seem innocent while directing more suspicion my way? I wasn't encouraging bandwagoning as an actual way to kill people, I was encouraging it as a way to observe them. You lead a full frontal assault against a chosen villager, making sure never to vote, and you watch who follows. You take notes on who refuses to band-wagon, and why. You add pluses or minuses for perceived sincerity. Before the person actually receives enough votes to die, you explain what you just did, and you decide how many people honestly believe in the guilt.
Wolves leave paths. It is up to us to track them. But how can we track them if you force innocent villagers to lay out their plans in an easy to read (and so, easy to work around) fashion? Observing band-wagoning could have worked like a charm. And yet Bergil flatly refused to see the merit of the plan. Perhaps now that I've completely outlined it, making it workably useless, he'll believe in my innocence?
Or perhaps he's already aware of it.
Of
Sleepy... now that's just a bad gut feeling. He said:
Quote:
|
Malkatoj may be a wolf but I'd like to look into a bit further, after seeing what Fea had to say he has definately topped the list of suspects along with her.
|
I don't know how what I had to say would convince anybody to suspect
Malkatoj, considering I went to great lengths to explain how much I did
not suspect him at all, and was simply using him because he's fairly vocal and made a good "scapegoat" for my theory.