![]() |
![]() |
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Maundering Mage
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,651
![]() ![]() |
Eomer has a point that I think should be considered. I for one am opposed to any game larger than the current. The main reason is that with 20+ players it's too difficult to try and read so many posts (some of great length), keep track of 20 players, work and maintain a family life.
So it might be worth considering a limit on the number of players I think 15 to 17 is ideal with no bear. I'm excited to see how this game goes though and see how the bear functions, hoping that I stay in longer than one day. So my opinion may change but that's my 2 cents. Also, if there is somebody dying to get in that hasn't yet I am willing to give up my spot to somebody that wants it badly.
__________________
“I wish it need not have happened in my time," said Frodo. "So do I," said Gandalf, "and so do all who live to see such times. But that is not for them to decide. All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us.” |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Shade of Carn Dûm
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: In the warm bosom of a Warg
Posts: 378
![]() |
![]()
I guess I kind of agree with Mormegil- over 20 villagers is a big number to keep track of. However, with the bear thrown in for an extra kill every night it's really not very long before the numbers are quite a bit lower. It's always going to be crazy and random for the first couple of days, so I don't have a problem with bigger numbers. Although I would like to be in a 'straight-werewolf' game- just 3 werewolves and maybe 9 innocents.
__________________
-- Well, I'm back. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Shade of Carn Dûm
|
While I agree with Morm that over 20 may make it too much for those of us in college or who work. I have also played many games of Mafia with 30 or 40 people and it just made the game a lot more intersting
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |