|
 |
|
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Canonicity means: | |||
| The author's published works, during his lifetime |
   
|
3 | 15.00% |
| The author's published works including those edited/published posthumously |
  
|
5 | 25.00% |
| ALL of the author's works, notes, letters, and ideas, published or not, conflicting or not |
  
|
9 | 45.00% |
| What the reading community says is Canon |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| What the BarrowDowns community says is Canon |
  
|
1 | 5.00% |
| What the critics say is Canon |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| Canon is whatever I, the reader, want it to be |
|
1 | 5.00% |
| Something completely (or slightly) different [if you choose this last option, please explain yourself in the thread. Thank you] |
|
1 | 5.00% |
| Voters: 20. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
08-21-2005, 06:34 PM
|
#11 |
|
Corpus Cacophonous
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: A green and pleasant land
Posts: 8,390
 |
Davem. However many times you restate your argument, you are not going to convince me. Nor, I suspect, the majority of contributors to this thread.
As far as I am concerned, any concept of Tolkien's Legendarium which does not include The Hobbit is one that I am not interested in. I accept, of course, that you are entitled to jettison The Hobbit from your own interpretation of the Legendarium, contrary to the author's intentions. It is your right as a reader.  
__________________
Do you mind? I'm busy doing the fishstick. It's a very delicate state of mind! Last edited by The Saucepan Man; 08-21-2005 at 06:58 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Threaded Mode