|
 |
|
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Canonicity means: | |||
| The author's published works, during his lifetime |
   
|
3 | 15.00% |
| The author's published works including those edited/published posthumously |
  
|
5 | 25.00% |
| ALL of the author's works, notes, letters, and ideas, published or not, conflicting or not |
  
|
9 | 45.00% |
| What the reading community says is Canon |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| What the BarrowDowns community says is Canon |
  
|
1 | 5.00% |
| What the critics say is Canon |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| Canon is whatever I, the reader, want it to be |
|
1 | 5.00% |
| Something completely (or slightly) different [if you choose this last option, please explain yourself in the thread. Thank you] |
|
1 | 5.00% |
| Voters: 20. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
08-19-2005, 01:31 PM
|
#29 |
|
Illustrious Ulair
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: In the home of lost causes, and forsaken beliefs, and unpopular names,and impossible loyalties
Posts: 4,240
 |
TH is clearly a 'non-canonical' secondarytext, of dubious value in terms of the actualite it presents. It may be accepted by some readers as having a value to the main body of the myth & by others as being 'mere' entertainment.
I think that sums up the positions....  And Flieger's argument was well presented & cogent. As is mine 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Threaded Mode