![]() |
|
|
|
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: The 'real meaning' of the Lord of the Rings is to be found in: | |||
| The Author's intent |
|
2 | 7.14% |
| The Reader's individual opinion |
|
6 | 21.43% |
| Mainstream Reader consensus |
|
0 | 0% |
| The BarrowDowns Book Forum consensus |
|
2 | 7.14% |
| A Glimpse of Divine Truth |
|
1 | 3.57% |
| The Reader's collaboration with both the Author's intent and the opinions of others |
|
4 | 14.29% |
| Divine Truth glimpsed by the individual Reader guided by the Author's intent |
|
3 | 10.71% |
| It does not have to have a 'meaning' at all, the books are entertaining, and that's sufficient |
|
5 | 17.86% |
| All of the above may be true up to an extent |
|
5 | 17.86% |
| Current poll does not cover all possible options at all, we need another, refined one [if you choose this answer, please list other possible options in the thread. Thank you] |
|
0 | 0% |
| Voters: 28. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#9 |
|
Auspicious Wraith
Join Date: May 2002
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 4,859
![]() ![]() |
But some meanings mean more and are more meaningful than other meanings, which are actually nonsense. So I see what you're saying TGWBS, but you must realise that sometimes there is a completely wrong answer.
But maybe never a right one. ![]() EDIT: Ok, I noticed the inverted commas around meaning in that option and now understand that it means *cough* an overriding central meaning. Right, that's ok. Not meaning *cough* that it has no meaning. I feel comfortable voting that way now.
__________________
Los Ingobernables de Harlond Last edited by Eomer of the Rohirrim; 08-17-2005 at 11:53 AM. Reason: To add a little bit... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|