![]() |
|
|
|
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
|
|
|
#1 | ||
|
Laconic Loreman
|
One I must make a few corrections in my previous post, the other I was also cross-posting with Encataire. One I had said...
Quote:
I agree with Firefoot's statement.... Quote:
And I am also faced with Firefoot's case, only for me it's better for me to vote earlier (which is about 11-12 pm my time) then get up at 7 am and vote.
__________________
Fenris Penguin
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: The bottom of the ocean, discussing philosophy with a giant squid
Posts: 2,254
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
I ♣ baby seals. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Fluttering Enchantment
|
Quote:
So right now my only real suspects are Gil-Galad and Durelin. Once I reread the two Ls' posts I will comment on them.
__________________
Comme une étoile amarante Comme un papillon de nuit C'est la lumière qui m'attire La flamme qui m'éblouit Fenris Muffin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Fluttering Enchantment
|
Well, I have reread Laitaine and Lalaith's posts and I am now suspicious of them. Reasons are that both of them voted for people who eather didn't have any votes or only had one, it could be that they either suspected those people or wanted to distract attention from Mith. Also in post #68 Saucie made a list of people who had posted but had said very little. Out of those 8 people Lalaith chose to only defend one person, Laitaine.
So you have heard my oppinion, you may hear from me again within the next 2 hours but then after that you wont hear from me for a while. I will be able to vote today.
__________________
Comme une étoile amarante Comme un papillon de nuit C'est la lumière qui m'attire La flamme qui m'éblouit Fenris Muffin
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: The bottom of the ocean, discussing philosophy with a giant squid
Posts: 2,254
![]() |
Lalaith doth seem a little suspiciouse, as I mentioned earlier, but I am not that confidente she is a Wolfe. She holdeth seconde place on my suspecte liste.
Gil-Galad, though, is ye moste suspiciouse in mine opinione, due to his vote for Gurthang yesterDaye withoute a cleare reasone after Mithalwen gained ye moste votes. If I had to vote now, I woulde vote for him. Durelin may be ye Cobbler trying to draw suspicione towarde those who verily are innocente, but she is not as suspiciouse as either of ye others. So Ye Olde Suspecte Liste goeth as follows: 1. Gil-Galad 2. Lalaith 3. Durelin
__________________
I ♣ baby seals. Last edited by Meneltarmacil; 08-15-2005 at 12:46 PM. Reason: add more unnecessary e's on the end of things. No trickery, I assure you. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Illusionary Holbytla
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 7,547
![]() |
I had started out thinking that there was probably at least one wolf that had voted for Mithalwen. However, looking at those who voted for her later (I doubt anyone who voted for Mith early is a wolf, for reasons other people have already stated), I don't find myself particularly suspicious of any of them. I feel pretty comfortable with SpM and Arcticstorm, and Dancing Spawn seems pretty innocent to me. I might look twice at Nonnacedak, but I'm not overly suspicious.
So, the rest of villagers are: LMP - I'm not too concerned about him. He had a valid reason for voting early, and based on what evidence we had at the time, Gurthang was a reasonable choice. He's not completely off my radar, but he's extremely peripheral. Gil - He is acting very strangely, and his defenses are extremely weak, though I won't go into that too much since other people have pretty much said how I feel. Most confusing to me is his statement that his votes aren't usually how he feels. His vote for Gurthang certainly seems like an attempt to draw attention away from Mith. I have no idea what he is playing at, and his moves seem foolish for either a wolf or a villager. Durelin - I'm not sure if I'm suspicious of her or not. First she votes for me for no apparent reason. Then she apparently doesn't have anything on me, saying "Late votes are good." Now she claims I'm the were-bear because I don't feel right to her. Um, sure. Besides, she claims Arcticstorm and SpM both are wolves, with both of whom I feel fairly safe. I can't tell if she is a confused innocent or a wolf trying to remove the spotlight to innocents. Laitaine - I need to hear more from her before I decide anything. I'm only a little suspicious of her, mostly for her odd vote of Alcarillo. Gurthang - I don't think he's a wolf because it would have been incredibly silly for Mithalwen to be the second person to vote for a fellow wolf when he is the only one with votes. Could be a bluff but I doubt it, as his posts don't seem terribly suspicious to me. Lalaith - She has the feel of trying to get by under the radar. She hasn't really said a whole lot when she has posted. I don't really know how I feel about her. Encaitare - I'd like to hear some more from her, though at this point I'm not overly suspicious. I would like to know who she finds suspicious. Wilwa - I don't really know about her either. I'd like to hear more from her as well. I've pretty well left the werebear out of my musings since I figure it could be anybody, even someone that I'm pretty comfortable with. I think we'll have to wait and see on that one, though Arctic's theory of Laitaine seems fairly credible to me. Edit - cross-posting with Wilwa and Menel. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Mischievous Candle
|
Thoughts of day 2
WereMithalwen said yesterday: My initial instinct is that those who speak first may be eager for a reason. To get in quick with sorrow for the dead and to manipulate opinion.Four first persons to post were Gurthang, Alcarillo, Boromir and Mormegil, respectively. Morm is now proven innocent. Could this mean that the other three can be excused, too, from wolvery (is that a word)?
Nonnacedak has posted only twice. She/he (I'm so sorry, could someone please enlighten me concerning this matter) tried to separate her/himself from the culprits quite fiercely. By Nonnacedak: "I am surrounded by liars and I am but a humble trout fisherman." "Us innocents must filter through the lies to save our poor village!" Nonnacedak was the sixth person to vote Mith, though. I'm suspecting that s/he could be the bear. But it's Gil who is my main suspect today. He posts very little. Yesterday he posted once to vote for Gurthang but he didn't even give reasons why. He said that his "reasons have already been said by other people". Who? Today he lamented the two deaths and posted two unbelievably flimsy explanations for his actions. Now, is he a wolf, cobbler or neither of those? One thing that bothers me is Mith suspicions about Lmp being the Seer. She said it twice that she's quite sure about it yet the remaining wolves didn't kill him during the night. Is Lmp one of the wolves? Random thought of the day: Imagine if Saucy is the bear. He's being so helpful in identifying the wolves. He even said himself: "I agree that it is in the Bear's interests too to kill the Wolves." He'll kill us all when we're not looking. I see that Lalaith & Laitaine seem suspicious to a few of you. I ponder that theory a bit later.
__________________
Fenris Wolf
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Blithe Spirit
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,779
![]() ![]() |
I don't post so much because I like to read and ponder everything that has been said before jumping in with my own ha'porth. And with so many villagers, there is a lot to ponder!
I have my own theories on yesterday's voting which will take time to explain and I will do so later tonight. But I would like to throw in one question for others to ponder (other than my question about the Bear and the Seer which I repeated twice but no-one has answered! )Anyway, my question is this. I am puzzled by Gurthang's voting yesterday. When he voted he had 3 votes against him, and Mithalwen six. In his shoes, with seven people still left to vote, I would probably have tried to guarantee my survival by voting for Mithalwen. But he didn't, he voted for Durelin. I'm fairly sure Gurthang isn't a wolf but this was a strange thing to do, could he be the Cobbler? (And a vote against a cat for an animal activist, even more curious!)
__________________
Out went the candle, and we were left darkling |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |||
|
Sword of Spirit
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Oh, I'm around.
Posts: 1,401
![]() |
Quote:
Now, I'm completely confused by CaptainOfDespair, Gil-Galad, and Durelin. CaptainOfDespair's 'lynch me and you'll see' posts are really stumping me. It is true that innocents have died and more will in these proceedings, but that doesn't me you should tell us to kill you, it just doesn't make sense. Gil-Galad voted for me yesterday saying that his reasons were stated by others. And now he is just confusing the heck out of me with his posts. Durelin: I voted for her yesterday because of my suspicion, and today she is also making strange statements and not really going anywhere with her posts. Yet someone else has come into my spotlight. Nonnacedak. Two out of his three posts seem to have been aimed at saying he's innocent. To quote: post #37 Quote:
Quote:
So, my suspect list(since everyone seems to love lists so much ) goes as follows:1. Nonnacedak 2. Durelin 3. Gil-Galad 4. CaptainOfDespair
__________________
I'm on a Mission from God. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Sword of Spirit
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Oh, I'm around.
Posts: 1,401
![]() |
After just reading Gil-galad's and Boromir's posts, (I cross-posted with both) I am now a little more suspicious of both Gil and CaptainOfDespair. Gil-galad seems to be trying to push the noose over to Captain(which could be the right way to go). The quotes by Captain that Boromir provided also make him seem suspicious.
Those two have moved up some, but I'd like to hear what people think of Nonnacedak.
__________________
I'm on a Mission from God. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Psyche of Prince Immortal
|
woah my dear fellow Gurthang, i said that to quote Homestarrunner...mainly for humour purposes...and it was yo uyourself that said my humour goes unappreciated
__________________
Love doesn't blow up and get killed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Shade of Carn Dûm
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: In the warm bosom of a Warg
Posts: 378
![]() |
I must say, Boromir88, I like your reasonig towards CoD, quite simply because I was in Durelin's little list, but didn't feel the need to lash out like the cap'n. After all, did that dirty blood-drinker Mithalwen not give herself away by protesting rather too much?
If I have to do a suspicion list (I know I don't have to- I just want to! ) I would go for:1/ CaptainOfDespair 2/ Gil-Galad 3/ Nonnacedak Those three are in no particular order, though- they're simply the three people I most likely see myself voting for before nightfall.
__________________
-- Well, I'm back. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | ||||||
|
Bittersweet Symphony
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: On the jolly starship Enterprise
Posts: 1,814
![]() |
I'm replying as I read the thread, so forgive me if the same points have been addressed by others.
Quote:
Quote:
I looked over SpM's nice little chart of voting stats, and I think it's interesting how the wolves apparently did not try to divert suspicion onto Gurthang after it seemed that Mith was the primary target. If the wolves voted late, perhaps it was too late for them to do so, but it could have been possible when Mith had 6 votes (which was a plateau for some time) and many villagers had not yet voted. Nonnacedak brought Mith's vote count up to six; while she had six votes, these people voted for others: Quote:
I therefore am suspicious of Gil, because when Gurthang had 2 votes and Mith had 3, he voted for Gurthang to tie it, possibly hoping that others would bandwagon on Gurthang. Quote:
Quote:
I'll vote around midnight, I think. I'll be looking at the stars, I suppose. Sometimes they make me feel less lonely... |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Laconic Loreman
|
Just another possibility to Lalaith's and Laitane's defense of one another, they could even be the Sheriffs? Or they couldn't who knows.
Quote:
Also I find your thoughts on Nonnacedek interesting. The sharp defenses of Mithalwen pointed out by Firefoot (post #41) got me mostly in my decision to vote for Mithalwen. Certainly it can be seen as it's the same case for Nonnacedek. The thing I keep seeing is if someone's accused and they are harsh in their defense they're most likely are guilty. If someone's innocent, and they know they're innocent, there should be nothing to fear. There was the Indian belief where they would heat up an iron bar, and would touch it on the tongue of a suspected liar. If it burned the person he was a liar, if it didn't he was ok. The belief was if you know you're not a liar there shouldn't be nothing to fear, so the saliva in your mouth will stop your tongue from burning (only placed it for not even a second, not like they held it there). But, when you're afraid you don't produce enough saliva, the rod would burn you, then you're a liar. Bottom line is we can't check people's saliva, but those who are harshly defend themselves are afraid of something. Those who know their innocence should not be worried.
__________________
Fenris Penguin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Blithe Spirit
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,779
![]() ![]() |
Aye, fair words you speak, Boromir, but against this I would say, that I have seen cases in villages stricken by tragedies such as ours, where the innocent said nothing, assuming their innocence would cry out to the heavens, but returned after absence or sleep to find their fellows had bandwaggoned against them and they were doomed.
So I will say this, as a last word before my return later tonight, to those who have voiced suspicions against me: that if I am a wolf I am a very stupid one. At the time I voted, Mithalwen the wolf had six votes against her and Gurthang had three. Any fellow wolf with half a brain-cell would do one of two things. He would either decide Mith was doomed anyway and vote for her himself to divert suspicion, or he would try to save her, or at least make a tie, by voting for Gurthang, the only other possible villager who was at risk of lynching. He would not, as I did, vote for someone completely different who had little or no chance of being lynched. And I would also say that in our haste to put our own words forward, let us not forget closely to study the words of others.
__________________
Out went the candle, and we were left darkling |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | ||
|
Corpus Cacophonous
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: A green and pleasant land
Posts: 8,390
![]() |
I've only time for a brief comment right now. I'll be back in a few hours to elaborate further on what I say below.
Quote:
Quote:
And here are my thoughts on how we might identify the Bear. The Bear doesn't mind who is lynched during the Day, as long as it is not him (reference to male pronouns to include the female). So it seems to me that it is in the Bear's interests to stir up suspicion and, as subtly as possible, to throw out a fair few accusations, while trying not to act overtly suspicious himself. He will also be looking to jump on any credible ideas on who should be lynched and try to develop them, in order to keep the lynch mob as far away as possible from himself. He will be particularly keen to promote any theories as to who (other than him, of course) might be the Bear. From what I have observed, the Villager who most fits this pattern of behaviour is CaptainofDespair. I am fairly certain that he is not a Wolf, but I am becoming increasingly suspicious that he may be the Black Beorning. When I come back later, I'll explain why in more detail.
__________________
Do you mind? I'm busy doing the fishstick. It's a very delicate state of mind! |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Shade of Carn Dûm
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 413
![]() |
Quote:
You'll be sorry when my death is shown as a vain enterprise. Then, you'll have another night where two will die. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Mischievous Candle
|
Quote:
__________________
Fenris Wolf
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |||
|
Mischievous Candle
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Fenris Wolf
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | ||
|
Pile O'Bones
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22
![]() |
O Happy Blessed Yesterday, a werewolf fiend was dead
Although they aimed to kill us, it was their time instead! O Friends Who Thought They Had No Clue, we had our first success Amplify your efforts so we maintain our progress! Although we killed one of those fiends, the wolves attack us still And this time, they have slaughtered our poor precious Mormegil! Not only that, but that Bear had to kill one of our friends, That vicious beast has got our barman, brought him to his end! O Foolish Me, for thinking Alcarillo was a foe I wish there could have been a better way for us to know! Perhaps I should explain the vote I cast on yesterday, I chose at random someone who had not had much to say Make no mistake, I doubted that my choice would be correct, I just chanced a wolf would be one we would not suspect Quote:
Clearly my vote was amiss, I’d followed flimsy thought But I assure you, Noble Friends, ‘twas not my havoc wrought! Arcticstorm, I must say that your theory is quite wise But I encourage you to look as from a Beorning’s eyes Why would the Bear take such a risk and draw such great attention To kill the very person of which they had just made mention? I think the Bear would like you all to think that it is me, For the very reasons Arcticstorm has put so succinctly. Believe when I say, my friends, that I am not the Bear. And although my words mean little, listen with great care. Arcticstorm could be simply trying to pin his guilt on me, But I do not think this the case--his thoughts run honestly. Quote:
Lalaith did defend me when my posts took so much time (You can imagine just how trying it is to speak in rhyme) But I think that comment was a passing kindness, nothing more I think Lalaith is just a normal person in this war. It seems that there’s precious little proof to go on for today, The only strangeness I observe is Gil’s vague-speaking way. Of course, I too thought Alcarillo’s quietness was strange But I was wrong on that account, so can Gil be deranged? *dabs eyes with hankie* Whatever is the case, my friends, my life has lost some years I never thought a werewolf would make off with poor Morm’s ears!
__________________
"Wizard's First Rule: People are stupid." Last edited by Laitaine; 08-15-2005 at 03:35 PM. Reason: putting in the quotes, adding "be" in fourth to last line |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Itinerant Songster
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The Edge of Faerie
Posts: 7,066
![]() ![]() |
I've read as far as post 120. Am having a hard time keeping up with this, which I implied in my response to the need for a replacement player.
Gil-Galad seems immature to me, and that's about it. Not particularly suspicious. Durelin has majorly ratched herself up as suspicious. Lalaith also seems somewhat suspicious. She kept asking about the Seer/Bear question. Nonnacedak seems suspicious to me over her "surrounded by liars" comment, but that could be in character. Boromir's post # 113 seemed like a great diversionary tactic. WilWarin in post 118 gave some pretty incisive reasoning regading Lalaith & Laitaine. I think she's innocent. Running out of time here, so: ++ Durelin I have no idea, by the way, of who has voted for whom. Just thought you should all know that. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Mischievous Candle
|
++ CAPTAINOFDESPAIR
For reasons, see Saucy's post #152. I'm now quite wary of Durelin, too, but I need to be sure if there's something wrong with our Captain.
__________________
Fenris Wolf
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|