![]() |
|
|
|
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: The meaning of The Lord of the Rings is to be found in | |||
| The intention of the author |
|
6 | 11.11% |
| The experience of the reader |
|
29 | 53.70% |
| Analysis of the text |
|
12 | 22.22% |
| I haven't the faintest idea, I just think the book is cool |
|
7 | 12.96% |
| Voters: 54. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#10 | ||
|
Cryptic Aura
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 6,005
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Oh, I never take Fordim at his word.
For instance, this little poll does seem to have drawn out many another Downer who never ventured into either the Enchantment thread or the Canonicity thread. Now, there's a democracy of entanglement if ever there was one. Quote:
Quote:
Or perhaps necromancy is not the most applicable metaphor. Mayhap a better one is that of a performance art, with the reader taking the place of the performer rather than member of the audience, who but listens. Indeedy, perhaps we can take this in a new direction which memory tells me was not examined on either of those two threads: we can even take Estelyn's discussion about music and the Music and apply it here. Estelyn on musical interpretation which was inspired by davem's post: davem on performance The ball's in other courts now, I believe.
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|