Of Bombadillos and Balrogs - The Barrow-Downs Discussion Forum

Orald · 02-08-2001, 01:12 PM

<font face="Verdana"><table><TR><TD><FONT SIZE="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Shade of Carn Dûm
Posts: 492</TD><TD></TD></TR></TABLE>
Re: Of Bombadillos and Balrogs

Tolkien specifically stated that Tom wasn't Iluvatar, but if you thinks so, then good for you <img src=smile.gif ALT="

">

And balrogs having wings can't be based on an artists depiction who has no real ties to Tolkien. I would believe that balrogs did have wings if Tolkien would have drawn a picture, but he didn't so I say they dont', someone else back me up here.

</p>

02-08-2001, 01:12 PM	#2
Orald Shadow of Malice Join Date: Nov 2000 Location: right behind you Posts: 843	<font face="Verdana"><table><TR><TD><FONT SIZE="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Shade of Carn Dûm Posts: 492</TD><TD></TD></TR></TABLE> Re: Of Bombadillos and Balrogs Tolkien specifically stated that Tom wasn't Iluvatar, but if you thinks so, then good for you <img src=smile.gif ALT=""> And balrogs having wings can't be based on an artists depiction who has no real ties to Tolkien. I would believe that balrogs did have wings if Tolkien would have drawn a picture, but he didn't so I say they dont', someone else back me up here. </p>