![]() |
|
|
|
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
|
#12 |
|
Pile O'Bones
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 13
![]() |
<font face="Verdana"><table><TR><TD><FONT SIZE="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Newly Deceased
Posts: 2</TD><TD></TD></TR></TABLE> <img src="http://www.barrowdowns.com/images/posticons/redeye.jpg" align=absmiddle> Re: The Witch-king of Angmar "He was just unlucky to have a little Hobbit wielding a dagger made for the specific purpose of killing him." i'm not quite sure i agree with that statement. there is no weapon that can harm a nazgul -- only the nature of the wielder. as has been mentioned by the witch-king when facing dernhelm/eowyn, no man can harm him. seeing that a hobbit is no man and neither is Eowyn, the type of blades used by both did not matter much at all. </p> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|